Literature DB >> 18283926

Seeing beyond the target: environmental context affects distance perception.

Jessica K Witt1, Jeanine K Stefanucci, Cedar R Riener, Dennis R Proffitt.   

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that perceived distance in full-cue, ecologically valid environments is redundantly specified and approximately veridical. However, recent research has called this assumption into question by demonstrating that distance perception varies in different types of environments even under full-cue viewing conditions. We report five experiments that demonstrate an effect of environmental context on perceived distance. We measured perceived distance in two types of environments (indoors and outdoors) with two types of measures (perceptual matching and blindwalking). We found effects of environmental context for both egocentric and exocentric distances. Across conditions, within individual experiments, all viewer-to-target depth-related variables were kept constant. The differences in perceived distance must therefore be explained by variations in the space beyond the target.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18283926     DOI: 10.1068/p5617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  16 in total

1.  The Effects of Age and Set Size on the Fast Extraction of Egocentric Distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; Courtney P Wallin; John W Philbeck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-01-22

Review 2.  Action potential influences spatial perception: Evidence for genuine top-down effects on perception.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

3.  The underestimation of egocentric distance: evidence from frontal matching tasks.

Authors:  Zhi Li; John Phillips; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The Roles for Prior Visual Experience and Age on the Extraction of Egocentric Distance.

Authors:  Courtney P Wallin; Daniel A Gajewski; Rebeca W Teplitz; Sandra Mihelic Jaidzeka; John W Philbeck
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Going the distance and beyond: simulated low vision increases perception of distance traveled during locomotion.

Authors:  Kristina M Rand; Erica M Barhorst-Cates; Eren Kiris; William B Thompson; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-04-21

6.  Within reach but not so reachable: obstacles matter in visual perception of distances.

Authors:  Nicolas Morgado; Edouard Gentaz; Eric Guinet; François Osiurak; Richard Palluel-Germain
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

7.  For humans navigating without vision, navigation depends upon the layout of mechanically contacted ground surfaces.

Authors:  Steven J Harrison; Scott Bonnette; MaryLauren Malone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The effect of navigation method and visual display on distance perception in a large-scale virtual building.

Authors:  Hengshan Li; Panagiotis Mavros; Jakub Krukar; Christoph Hölscher
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-02-09

Review 9.  There or not there? A multidisciplinary review and research agenda on the impact of transparent barriers on human perception, action, and social behavior.

Authors:  Gesine Marquardt; Emily S Cross; Alexandra A de Sousa; Eve Edelstein; Alessandro Farnè; Marcin Leszczynski; Miles Patterson; Susanne Quadflieg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-15

10.  Neural extrapolation of motion for a ball rolling down an inclined plane.

Authors:  Barbara La Scaleia; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.