Literature DB >> 18283579

Pulse-lavage washing is an effective method for defatting of morselized allograft bone in the operating theater.

Suvi Haimi1, Marko Wahlman, Mari Mannila, Vesa Virtanen, Martti Hirn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Incorporation of fresh-frozen allograft bone and safety aspects associated with this procedure can be improved by removing blood and lipids from the bone. We investigated in a quantitative manner how efficient pulse lavage might be for removal of adipose tissue from morselized allograft bone.
METHODS: Depending on the study, the washing was performed with an average of 0.8 L or 1.6 L of sterile saline at room temperature. Fat content of the morselized bone samples was determined using hexane elution. The efficiency of pulse lavage alone was compared with that after an additional wash in 12 L of warm water (55 degrees C). Unprocessed controls were also included for comparison.
RESULTS: Pulse lavage with 0.8 L saline alone removed 80% of the fat from the bone, whereas 95% of the fat was removed when washing was performed with 1.6 L of saline. The cleansing efficacy was improved further when an additional wash with warm water was used.
INTERPRETATION: Our results indicate that pulse-lavage washing alone at room temperature is an effective method for defatting of morselized allograft bone, but an additional wash with warm water improves the cleansing efficiency. Pulse lavage is easily available and simple to use in the operating theater.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18283579     DOI: 10.1080/17453670710014824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  5 in total

1.  Rinsing of allograft bone does not improve implant fixation: a study in 12 dogs.

Authors:  Jeppe Barckman; Jorgen Baas; Mette Sørensen; Joan E Bechtold; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 3.717

2.  Pulsed lavage cleansing of osteochondral grafts depends on lavage duration, flow intensity, and graft storage condition.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Weibo Jiang; Esther Cory; Jason P Caffrey; Felix H Hsu; Albert C Chen; Jincheng Wang; Robert L Sah; William D Bugbee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparing the speed of irrigation between pulsatile lavage versus gravity irrigation: an Ex-vivo experimental investigation.

Authors:  Lily R Mundy; Mark J Gage; Richard S Yoon; Frank A Liporace
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2017-03-27

4.  Donor-Specific Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibody Formation After Allograft Glenoid Reconstruction Occurs But Does Not Impact Clinicoradiographic Outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel R Liwski; Robert S Liwski; Ivan Wong
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Metrics of OsteoChondral Allografts (MOCA) Group Consensus Statements on the Use of Viable Osteochondral Allograft.

Authors:  Simon Görtz; Suzanne M Tabbaa; Deryk G Jones; John D Polousky; Dennis C Crawford; William D Bugbee; Brian J Cole; Jack Farr; James E Fleischli; Alan Getgood; Andreas H Gomoll; Allan E Gross; Aaron J Krych; Christian Lattermann; Bert R Mandelbaum; Peter R Mandt; Raffy Mirzayan; Timothy S Mologne; Matthew T Provencher; Scott A Rodeo; Oleg Safir; Eric D Strauss; Christopher J Wahl; Riley J Williams; Adam B Yanke
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.