Literature DB >> 18282152

Physicians' preferences towards coagulation factor concentrates in the treatment of Haemophilia with inhibitors: a discrete choice experiment.

W C Lee1, A V Joshi, S Woolford, M Sumner, M Brown, N Hadker, C L Pashos.   

Abstract

This study sought to identify attributes of treatment important to haematologists in making their decisions regarding optimal care for inhibitor patients in the United States. A conjoint analysis using a discrete choice experiment was conducted to elicit factors that are most important to haematologists. Twelve product attributes were chosen based on published literature and expert opinion: risk of human viral infections, possibility that the titre of the inhibitor may rise, reduction in the likelihood of dose-related thromboembolic events, the number of infusions required to stop haemorrhage, infusion preparation time, infusion time, infusion volume, time required to stop bleeding, time required to alleviate pain, prophylaxis use, ability to undergo major surgery and cost of medications. Thirty haematologists completed the questionnaires via face-to-face interviews at a scientific meeting in April 2006. Data were analysed using a multinomial logit model to obtain the relative importance of each attribute. Responding haematologists had considerable experience in treating haemophilia patients with inhibitors (average : 13 +/- 9 years). 'Time required to stop bleeding' was the most important factor affecting treatment decisions [relative importance (RI) = 16.3%]. Physicians also preferred treatments that resulted in quick pain relief [RI = 12.9%], reduced the possibility that the titre of inhibitor may rise [RI = 12.8%], required fewer number of infusions to stop a haemorrhage [RI = 12.7%] and reduced the risk of human viral infection [RI = 10.8%]. This study revealed that certain clinical outcomes attributes are the most preferred and important. These findings can assist decision makers in their assessments of optimal first-line care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18282152     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01656.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  6 in total

Review 1.  Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mark Harrison; Dan Rigby; Caroline Vass; Terry Flynn; Jordan Louviere; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Patient benefit-risk preferences for targeted agents in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ateesha F Mohamed; A Brett Hauber; Maureen P Neary
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The first recombinant human coagulation factor VIII of human origin: human cell line and manufacturing characteristics.

Authors:  Elisabeth Casademunt; Kristina Martinelle; Mats Jernberg; Stefan Winge; Maya Tiemeyer; Lothar Biesert; Sigurd Knaub; Olaf Walter; Carola Schröder
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Developing a new scoring scheme for the Hemophilia Joint Health Score 2.1.

Authors:  Tiago Ribeiro; Audrey Abad; Brian M Feldman
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2019-05-20

5.  Patient and parent preferences for characteristics of prophylactic treatment in hemophilia.

Authors:  Roberto Furlan; Sangeeta Krishnan; Jeffrey Vietri
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 6.  Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Alison Pearce; Mark Harrison; Verity Watson; Deborah J Street; Kirsten Howard; Nick Bansback; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.883

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.