Literature DB >> 18281417

Functional conservation of clock-related genes in flowering plants: overexpression and RNA interference analyses of the circadian rhythm in the monocotyledon Lemna gibba.

Masayuki Serikawa1, Kumiko Miwa, Takao Kondo, Tokitaka Oyama.   

Abstract

Circadian rhythms are found in organisms from cyanobacteria to plants and animals. In flowering plants, the circadian clock is involved in the regulation of various physiological phenomena, including growth, leaf movement, stomata opening, and floral transitions. Molecular mechanisms underlying the circadian clock have been identified using Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana); the functions and genetic networks of a number of clock-related genes, including CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1, LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY), TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION1, GIGANTEA (GI), and EARLY FLOWERING3 (ELF3), have been analyzed. The degree to which clock systems are conserved among flowering plants, however, is still unclear. We previously isolated homologs for Arabidopsis clock-related genes from monocotyledon Lemna plants. Here, we report the physiological roles of these Lemna gibba genes (LgLHYH1, LgLHYH2, LgGIH1, and LgELF3H1) in the circadian system. We studied the effects of overexpression and RNA interference (RNAi) of these genes on the rhythmic expression of morning- and evening-specific reporters. Overexpression of each gene disrupted the rhythmicity of either or both reporters, suggesting that these four homologs can be involved in the circadian system. RNAi of each of the genes except LgLHYH2 affected the bioluminescence rhythms of both reporters. These results indicated that these homologs are involved in the circadian system of Lemna plants and that the structure of the circadian clock is likely to be conserved between monocotyledons and dicotyledons. Interestingly, RNAi of LgGIH1 almost completely abolished the circadian rhythm; because this effect appeared to be much stronger than the phenotype observed in an Arabidopsis gi loss-of-function mutant, the precise role of each clock gene may have diverged in the clock systems of Lemna and Arabidopsis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18281417      PMCID: PMC2287362          DOI: 10.1104/pp.107.114611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  34 in total

1.  Loss of the circadian clock-associated protein 1 in Arabidopsis results in altered clock-regulated gene expression.

Authors:  R M Green; E M Tobin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Winter disruption of the circadian clock in chestnut.

Authors:  Alberto Ramos; Estefanía Pérez-Solís; Cristian Ibáñez; Rosa Casado; Carmen Collada; Luis Gómez; Cipriano Aragoncillo; Isabel Allona
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Late-flowering genes interact with early-flowering genes to regulate flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  M L Chou; C H Yang
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  LUX ARRHYTHMO encodes a Myb domain protein essential for circadian rhythms.

Authors:  Samuel P Hazen; Thomas F Schultz; Jose L Pruneda-Paz; Justin O Borevitz; Joseph R Ecker; Steve A Kay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Positive and negative factors confer phase-specific circadian regulation of transcription in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Stacey L Harmer; Steve A Kay
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2005-05-27       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 6.  Pseudo-Response Regulators (PRRs) or True Oscillator Components (TOCs).

Authors:  Takeshi Mizuno; Norihito Nakamichi
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2005-03-13       Impact factor: 4.927

7.  Conservation and divergence of circadian clock operation in a stress-inducible Crassulacean acid metabolism species reveals clock compensation against stress.

Authors:  Susanna F Boxall; Jonathan M Foster; Hans J Bohnert; John C Cushman; Hugh G Nimmo; James Hartwell
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  LHY and CCA1 are partially redundant genes required to maintain circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Mizoguchi; Kay Wheatley; Yoshie Hanzawa; Louisa Wright; Mutsuko Mizoguchi; Hae Ryong Song; Isabelle A Carré; George Coupland
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 12.270

9.  Control of circadian rhythms and photoperiodic flowering by the Arabidopsis GIGANTEA gene.

Authors:  D H Park; D E Somers; Y S Kim; Y H Choy; H K Lim; M S Soh; H J Kim; S A Kay; H G Nam
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-09-03       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Constitutive expression of the CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) gene disrupts circadian rhythms and suppresses its own expression.

Authors:  Z Y Wang; E M Tobin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-06-26       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Similarities in the circadian clock and photoperiodism in plants.

Authors:  Young Hun Song; Shogo Ito; Takato Imaizumi
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.834

Review 2.  Monitoring circadian rhythms of individual cells in plants.

Authors:  Tomoaki Muranaka; Tokitaka Oyama
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Monitoring single-cell bioluminescence of Arabidopsis leaves to quantitatively evaluate the efficiency of a transiently introduced CRISPR/Cas9 system targeting the circadian clock gene ELF3.

Authors:  Yuki Kanesaka; Masaaki Okada; Shogo Ito; Tokitaka Oyama
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol (Tokyo)       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 1.133

4.  Robust circadian rhythms of gene expression in Brassica rapa tissue culture.

Authors:  Xiaodong Xu; Qiguang Xie; C Robertson McClung
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  DIE NEUTRALIS and LATE BLOOMER 1 contribute to regulation of the pea circadian clock.

Authors:  Lim Chee Liew; Valérie Hecht; Rebecca E Laurie; Claire L Knowles; Jacqueline K Vander Schoor; Richard C Macknight; James L Weller
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Expression of putative circadian clock components in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizoglomus irregulare.

Authors:  Soon-Jae Lee; Mengxuan Kong; David Morse; Mohamed Hijri
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.387

7.  Expression conservation within the circadian clock of a monocot: natural variation at barley Ppd-H1 affects circadian expression of flowering time genes, but not clock orthologs.

Authors:  Chiara Campoli; Munqez Shtaya; Seth J Davis; Maria von Korff
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 4.215

8.  Does the core circadian clock in the moss Physcomitrella patens (Bryophyta) comprise a single loop?

Authors:  Karl Holm; Thomas Källman; Niclas Gyllenstrand; Harald Hedman; Ulf Lagercrantz
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 9.  Molecular mechanisms underlying the Arabidopsis circadian clock.

Authors:  Norihito Nakamichi
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 4.927

10.  A map-based cloning strategy employing a residual heterozygous line reveals that the GIGANTEA gene is involved in soybean maturity and flowering.

Authors:  Satoshi Watanabe; Zhengjun Xia; Rumiko Hideshima; Yasutaka Tsubokura; Shusei Sato; Naoki Yamanaka; Ryoji Takahashi; Toyoaki Anai; Satoshi Tabata; Keisuke Kitamura; Kyuya Harada
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.