Literature DB >> 18281409

Atomoxetine and osmotically released methylphenidate for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: acute comparison and differential response.

Jeffrey H Newcorn1, Christopher J Kratochvil, Albert J Allen, Charles D Casat, Dustin D Ruff, Rodney J Moore, David Michelson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Response to atomoxetine, a nonstimulant norepinephrine-specific reuptake inhibitor, was compared with the effect of osmotic-release oral methylphenidate, a long-acting methylphenidate preparation, in patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
METHOD: In a large placebo-controlled, double-blind study, patients ages 6-16 with ADHD, any subtype, were randomly assigned to receive 0.8-1.8 mg/kg per day of atomoxetine (N=222), 18-54 mg/day of osmotically released methylphenidate (N=220), or placebo (N=74) for 6 weeks. The a priori specified primary analysis compared response (at least 40% decrease in ADHD Rating Scale total score) to osmotically released methylphenidate with response to atomoxetine and placebo. After 6 weeks, patients treated with methylphenidate were switched to atomoxetine under double-blind conditions.
RESULTS: The response rates for both atomoxetine (45%) and methylphenidate (56%) were markedly superior to that for placebo (24%), but the response to osmotically released methylphenidate was superior to that for atomoxetine. Each medication was well tolerated, with completion rates and discontinuations for adverse events not significantly different from those for placebo. Of the 70 subjects who did not respond to methylphenidate, 30 (43%) subsequently responded to atomoxetine. Likewise, 29 (42%) of the 69 patients who did not respond to atomoxetine had previously responded to osmotically released methylphenidate.
CONCLUSION: Response was significantly greater with osmotically released methylphenidate than with atomoxetine. One-third of patients who received methylphenidate followed by atomoxetine responded better to one or the other, suggesting that there may be preferential responders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18281409     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.05091676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  104 in total

Review 1.  An update on the pharmacotherapy of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults.

Authors:  Timothy E Wilens; Nicholas R Morrison; Jefferson Prince
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.618

2.  A liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay for the analysis of atomoxetine in human plasma and in vitro cellular samples.

Authors:  David I Appel; Bryan Brinda; John S Markowitz; Jeffrey H Newcorn; Hao-Jie Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Chromatogr       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 1.902

3.  Stimulant ADHD medication and risk for substance abuse.

Authors:  Zheng Chang; Paul Lichtenstein; Linda Halldner; Brian D'Onofrio; Eva Serlachius; Seena Fazel; Niklas Långström; Henrik Larsson
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 8.982

4.  ADHD: clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Mark Wolraich; Lawrence Brown; Ronald T Brown; George DuPaul; Marian Earls; Heidi M Feldman; Theodore G Ganiats; Beth Kaplanek; Bruce Meyer; James Perrin; Karen Pierce; Michael Reiff; Martin T Stein; Susanna Visser
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 5.  Evaluation of Methylphenidate Safety and Maximum-Dose Titration Rationale in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cellina Ching; Guy D Eslick; Alison S Poulton
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 16.193

6.  Discontinuation of pharmacological treatment of children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: meta-analysis of 63 studies enrolling 11,788 patients.

Authors:  M Riera; X Castells; A Tobias; R Cunill; L Blanco; D Capellà
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Psychostimulants as cognitive enhancers: the prefrontal cortex, catecholamines, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Craig W Berridge; David M Devilbiss
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Toward a new understanding of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: advances in research and treatment.

Authors:  Thomas J Spencer
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 9.  Atomoxetine: a review of its use in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Karly P Garnock-Jones; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.022

10.  Neuropharmacological effect of atomoxetine on attention network in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during oddball paradigms as assessed using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Masako Nagashima; Yukifumi Monden; Ippeita Dan; Haruka Dan; Tsutomu Mizutani; Daisuke Tsuzuki; Yasushi Kyutoku; Yuji Gunji; Daisuke Hirano; Takamichi Taniguchi; Hideo Shimoizumi; Mariko Y Momoi; Takanori Yamagata; Eiju Watanabe
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.593

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.