Literature DB >> 18281386

Formation of the open complex by bacterial RNA polymerase--a quantitative model.

Marko Djordjevic1, Ralf Bundschuh.   

Abstract

Over the last two decades, a large amount of data on initiation of transcription by bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) has been obtained. However, a question of how the open complex is formed still remains open, and several qualitative hypotheses for opening of DNA by RNAP have been proposed. To provide a theoretical framework needed to analyze the assembled experimental data, we here develop the first quantitative model of the open complex formation by bacterial RNAP. We first show that a simple hypothesis (which might follow from recent bioinformatic and experimental results), by which promoter DNA is melted in one step through thermal fluctuations, is inconsistent with experimental data. We next consider a more complex two-step view of the open complex formation. According to this hypothesis, the transcription bubble is formed in the -10 region, and consequently extends to the transcription start site. We derive how the open complex formation rate depends on DNA duplex melting energy and on interaction energies of RNAP with promoter DNA in the closed and open complex. This relationship provides an explicit connection between transcription initiation rate and physical properties of the promoter sequence and promoter-RNAP interactions. We compare our model with both biochemical measurements and genomics data and report a very good agreement with the experiments, with no free parameters used in model testing. This agreement therefore strongly supports both the quantitative model that we propose and the qualitative hypothesis on which the model is based. From a practical point, our results allow efficient estimation of promoter kinetic parameters, as well as engineering of promoter sequences with the desired kinetic properties.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18281386      PMCID: PMC2480673          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.116970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  54 in total

1.  Statistical mechanical simulation of polymeric DNA melting with MELTSIM.

Authors:  R D Blake; J W Bizzaro; J D Blake; G R Day; S G Delcourt; J Knowles; K A Marx; J SantaLucia
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Real-time characterization of intermediates in the pathway to open complex formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase at the T7A1 promoter.

Authors:  Bianca Sclavi; Evgeny Zaychikov; Anastasia Rogozina; Ferdinand Walther; Malcolm Buckle; Hermann Heumann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Escherichia coli RNA polymerase contacts outside the -10 promoter element are not essential for promoter melting.

Authors:  Anita Niedziela-Majka; Tomasz Heyduk
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Sequence-dependent base pair opening in DNA double helix.

Authors:  Andrew Krueger; Ekaterina Protozanova; Maxim D Frank-Kamenetskii
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Quantitative modeling and data analysis of SELEX experiments.

Authors:  Marko Djordjevic; Anirvan M Sengupta
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Specific recognition of the -10 promoter element by the free RNA polymerase sigma subunit.

Authors:  Anastasiya Sevostyanova; Andrey Feklistov; Nataliya Barinova; Ewa Heyduk; Irina Bass; Saulius Klimasauskas; Tomasz Heyduk; Andrey Kulbachinskiy
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Promoter recognition by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: effects of the UP element on open complex formation and promoter clearance.

Authors:  M G Strainic; J J Sullivan; A Velevis; P L deHaseth
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-12-22       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Solute probes of conformational changes in open complex (RPo) formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase at the lambdaPR promoter: evidence for unmasking of the active site in the isomerization step and for large-scale coupled folding in the subsequent conversion to RPo.

Authors:  Wayne S Kontur; Ruth M Saecker; Caroline A Davis; Michael W Capp; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  RegulonDB (version 5.0): Escherichia coli K-12 transcriptional regulatory network, operon organization, and growth conditions.

Authors:  Heladia Salgado; Socorro Gama-Castro; Martín Peralta-Gil; Edgar Díaz-Peredo; Fabiola Sánchez-Solano; Alberto Santos-Zavaleta; Irma Martínez-Flores; Verónica Jiménez-Jacinto; César Bonavides-Martínez; Juan Segura-Salazar; Agustino Martínez-Antonio; Julio Collado-Vides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A novel method for prokaryotic promoter prediction based on DNA stability.

Authors:  Aditi Kanhere; Manju Bansal
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Systems biophysics of gene expression.

Authors:  Jose M G Vilar; Leonor Saiz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Predicting strength and function for promoters of the Escherichia coli alternative sigma factor, sigmaE.

Authors:  Virgil A Rhodius; Vivek K Mutalik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Redefining Escherichia coli σ(70) promoter elements: -15 motif as a complement of the -10 motif.

Authors:  Marko Djordjevic
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Promoter Recognition by Extracytoplasmic Function σ Factors: Analyzing DNA and Protein Interaction Motifs.

Authors:  Jelena Guzina; Marko Djordjevic
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Duplex DNA Is Weakened in Nanoconfinement.

Authors:  Sagun Jonchhe; Shankar Pandey; Deepak Karna; Pravin Pokhrel; Yunxi Cui; Shubham Mishra; Hiroshi Sugiyama; Masayuki Endo; Hanbin Mao
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Mix-and-matching as a promoter recognition mechanism by ECF σ factors.

Authors:  Jelena Guzina; Marko Djordjevic
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  CarD contributes to diverse gene expression outcomes throughout the genome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Dennis X Zhu; Ashley L Garner; Eric A Galburt; Christina L Stallings
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Studying transcription initiation by RNA polymerase with diffusion-based single-molecule fluorescence.

Authors:  Yazan Alhadid; SangYoon Chung; Eitan Lerner; Dylan J Taatjes; Sergei Borukhov; Shimon Weiss
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-04-02       Impact factor: 6.993

9.  A biophysical model of supercoiling dependent transcription predicts a structural aspect to gene regulation.

Authors:  Christopher H Bohrer; Elijah Roberts
Journal:  BMC Biophys       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 4.778

10.  Systematic Dissection of Sequence Elements Controlling σ70 Promoters Using a Genomically Encoded Multiplexed Reporter Assay in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Guillaume Urtecho; Arielle D Tripp; Kimberly D Insigne; Hwangbeom Kim; Sriram Kosuri
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.