Literature DB >> 18281334

Vortex wake and flight kinematics of a swift in cruising flight in a wind tunnel.

P Henningsson1, G R Spedding, A Hedenström.   

Abstract

In this paper we describe the flight characteristics of a swift (Apus apus) in cruising flight at three different flight speeds (8.0, 8.4 and 9.2 m s(-1)) in a low turbulence wind tunnel. The wingbeat kinematics were recorded by high-speed filming and the wake of the bird was visualized by digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV). Certain flight characteristics of the swift differ from those of previously studied species. As the flight speed increases, the angular velocity of the wingbeat remains constant, and so as the wingbeat amplitude increases, the frequency decreases accordingly, as though the flight muscles were contracting at a fixed rate. The wings are also comparatively inflexible and are flexed or retracted rather little during the upstroke. The upstroke is always aerodynamically active and this is reflected in the wake, where shedding of spanwise vorticity occurs throughout the wingbeat. Although the wake superficially resembles those of other birds in cruising flight, with a pair of trailing wingtip vortices connected by spanwise vortices, the continuous shedding of first positive vorticity during the downstroke and then negative vorticity during the upstroke suggests a wing whose circulation is gradually increasing and then decreasing during the wingbeat cycle. The wake (and implied wing aerodynamics) are not well described by discrete vortex loop models, but a new wake-based model, where incremental spanwise and streamwise variations of the wake impulse are integrated over the wingbeat, shows good agreement of the vertical momentum flux with the required weight support. The total drag was also estimated from the wake alone, and the calculated lift:drag ratio of approximately 13 for flapping flight is the highest measured yet for birds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18281334     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.012146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  20 in total

1.  A quantitative comparison of bird and bat wakes.

Authors:  L Christoffer Johansson; Marta Wolf; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Elytra boost lift, but reduce aerodynamic efficiency in flying beetles.

Authors:  L Christoffer Johansson; Sophia Engel; Emily Baird; Marie Dacke; Florian T Muijres; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Structure of the vortex wake in hovering Anna's hummingbirds (Calypte anna).

Authors:  M Wolf; V M Ortega-Jimenez; R Dudley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Beyond robins: aerodynamic analyses of animal flight.

Authors:  Anders Hedenström; Geoffrey Spedding
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Power of the wingbeat: modelling the effects of flapping wings in vertebrate flight.

Authors:  M Klein Heerenbrink; L C Johansson; A Hedenström
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.704

6.  Negotiating an ecological barrier: crossing the Sahara in relation to winds by common swifts.

Authors:  Susanne Åkesson; Giuseppe Bianco; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Mechanical power curve measured in the wake of pied flycatchers indicates modulation of parasite power across flight speeds.

Authors:  L Christoffer Johansson; Masateru Maeda; Per Henningsson; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Time-resolved vortex wake of a common swift flying over a range of flight speeds.

Authors:  P Henningsson; F T Muijres; A Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Wake structure and kinematics in two insectivorous bats.

Authors:  Tatjana Y Hubel; Nickolay I Hristov; Sharon M Swartz; Kenneth S Breuer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Flight speeds of swifts (Apus apus): seasonal differences smaller than expected.

Authors:  P Henningsson; H Karlsson; J Bäckman; T Alerstam; A Hedenström
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.