Literature DB >> 18281262

Comparison of the effects of Twin Block and activator treatment on the soft tissue profile.

Selin Kale Varlik1, Ali Gültan, Nazli Tümer.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of activator and Twin Block (TB) appliances on the soft tissue profile. The study included 50 skeletal Class II patients (25 girls and 25 boys, mean age: 11.9 +/- 0.16 years) who were randomly allocated to one of two functional appliance treatment groups. The control group included 25 untreated skeletal Class II patients (13 boys and 12 girls, mean age: 10.11 +/- 0.91 years). Data were obtained from standardized lateral cephalograms taken at the beginning (T0) and end (T1) of appliance wear. The mean treatment time was 9 months for the activator group and 8 months for the TB group. The observation period of the control group was 8 months. Soft tissue profile changes were evaluated by means of 12 linear and five angular measurements. The groups were compared at T0 and T1 using analysis of variance, and treatment/observation differences (T1-T0) were evaluated with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Treatment changes in both appliance groups differed significantly (P < or = 0.001) from those in the control group, except for Ss-y, Ls-y, Li-E, and A-y measurements in the TB group and Ls-y, Li-E, nasolabial angle, and A-y measurements in the activator group. When the effects of the two appliances were compared, significant differences were observed only for SS-y (P < or = 0.05), Ss-E (P < or = 0.05), Si-E (P < or = 0.05), and nasolabial angle (P < or = 0.01). The effects of the activator and TB appliances on the soft tissue profile were similar; both significantly changed the soft tissue profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18281262     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjm121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  13 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes one year post-treatment in Twin Block and FORSUS FRD treated patients.

Authors:  Dinesh Chander Chaudhary; Prasanna Kumar; Mohit Sharma; Karan Nehra
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-12-15

2.  Three-dimensional skeletal, dentoalveolar and temporomandibular joint changes produced by Twin Block functional appliance.

Authors:  Hanem Younes Elfeky; Mona Salah Fayed; Maged Sultan Alhammadi; Sanaa Abou Zeid Soliman; Dalia Mohamed El Boghdadi
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  How patient-selected colors for removable appliances are reflected in electronically tracked compliance (wear times and wear behavior).

Authors:  Timm C Schott; Dieter Menne
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Does Appliance Design Affect Treatment Outcomes of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion? A Two-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Burçin Akan; Türkan Sezen Erhamza
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2021-06-30

5.  Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Twin Block appliance in subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages.

Authors:  Aisha Khoja; Mubassar Fida; Attiya Shaikh
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016-06

6.  Comparison of Activator-Headgear and Twin Block Treatment Approaches in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion.

Authors:  Stjepan Spalj; Kate Mroz Tranesen; Kari Birkeland; Visnja Katic; Andrej Pavlic; Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  A Prospective Study Comparing Adolescent and Post-Adolescent Periods Regarding Effects of Activator Appliance in Patients with Class II Mandibular Retrognathia by Using 3dMDface Analysis and Cephalometry.

Authors:  Esra Yüksel Coşkun; Elçin Esenlik
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-06-26

8.  Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography analysis of temporomandibular joint response to the Twin-block functional appliance.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Jiang; Lian Sun; Hua Wang; Chun-Yang Zhao; Wei-Bing Zhang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Comparative Evaluation of Esthetic and Structural Aspects in Class II Functional Therapy. A Case-Control Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Gabriella Galluccio; Rosanna Guarnieri; Diana Jamshir; Alessandra Impellizzeri; Gaetano Ierardo; Ersilia Barbato
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Dentoskeletal effects of class II malocclusion treatment with the modified Twin Block appliance.

Authors:  Shabnam Ajami; Anahita Morovvat; Bahar Khademi; Dana Jafarpour; Neda Babanouri
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.