Literature DB >> 1828111

Pain and impairment beliefs in chronic low back pain: validation of the Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (PAIRS).

Mark A Slater1, Holly F Hall, Hampton J Atkinson, Steven R Garfin.   

Abstract

Few validated instruments are available to assess beliefs and attitudes that patients have regarding pain, or ability to function despite discomfort. The Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (PAIRS) was developed to tap these important beliefs and attitudes in chronic pain patients. Preliminary data indicate that the PAIRS is internally consistent and significantly related to impairment in a highly selected pain clinic sample of patients, including some chronic low back pain patients. The present study was designed to extend the validation of the PAIRS to a more general sample of chronic benign low back pain patients. Furthermore, additional tests supported the discriminant, convergent and divergent validity, as well as the reliability and relative independence from favorable self-report response bias of the PAIRS, by respectively demonstrating that: (1) the impairment beliefs assessed with the PAIRS were more prominent in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients than in matched non-pain, healthy controls; (2) scores on the PAIRS were significantly related to measures of physical impairment, but not to physicians ratings of disease severity; (3) the impairment beliefs assessed with the PAIRS are readily distinguishable from cognitive distortions and emotional distress; (4) PAIRS scores for chronic low back pain patients are relatively consistent over time; and (5) PAIRS scores are not significantly associated with measures of favorable self-report response bias. We conclude that the PAIRS has demonstrated at least preliminary utility for applications by researchers and clinicians interested in chronic pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1828111     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(91)90146-O

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  6 in total

1.  A brief primary care intervention to reduce fear of movement in chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  Thomas P Guck; Raymond V Burke; Christopher Rainville; Dreylana Hill-Taylor; Dustin P Wallace
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  The modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: a novel approach to defining pathologic and nonpathologic scarring.

Authors:  Regina M Fearmonti; Jennifer E Bond; Detlev Erdmann; L Scott Levin; Salvatore V Pizzo; Howard Levinson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Supervisor and Organizational Factors Associated with Supervisor Support of Job Accommodations for Low Back Injured Workers.

Authors:  Vicki L Kristman; William S Shaw; Paula Reguly; Kelly Williams-Whitt; Sophie Soklaridis; Patrick Loisel
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-03

4.  [Multidisciplinary treatment program on chronic low back pain, part 3. Psychosocial aspects].

Authors:  M Pfingsten; C Franz; J Hildebrandt; P Saur; D Seeger
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1996-12-16       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Testing the effectiveness of an innovative information package on practitioner reported behaviour and beliefs: the UK Chiropractors, Osteopaths and Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists Low back pain ManagemENT (COMPLeMENT) trial [ISRCTN77245761].

Authors:  David W Evans; Nadine E Foster; Martin Underwood; Steven Vogel; Alan C Breen; Tamar Pincus
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Development and measurement properties of the AxEL (attitude toward education and advice for low-back-pain) questionnaire.

Authors:  Edel T O'Hagan; Ian W Skinner; Matthew D Jones; Emma L Karran; Adrian C Traeger; Aidan G Cashin; Benedict M Wand; Siobhan M Schabrun; Sean O'Neill; Ian A Harris; James H McAuley
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.186

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.