Literature DB >> 18280923

Risk estimates of hysterectomy and selected conditions commonly treated with hysterectomy.

Ray M Merrill1, Annah B Layman, Gary Oderda, Carl Asche.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study presents corrected rates and probability (risk) estimates of experiencing a hysterectomy and of selected conditions commonly treated with hysterectomy.
METHODS: Analyses are based on hysterectomy prevalence data from the Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (calendar years 2000-2006), hysterectomy incidence data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey (2001-2005), and population estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau (2001-2005). The correction involved removing those women without a uterus from the denominator in the rate calculation.
RESULTS: Corrected hysterectomy incidence rates per 1000 women were greater than the uncorrected rates for women ages 18-44 years (6.0 vs. 5.0), 45-64 years (10.4 vs. 7.1), and 65 years and older (4.9 vs. 2.6). Correcting the rates had a comparatively larger impact in the South. Incidence rates of selected conditions associated with the female reproductive system were greater after correction for hysterectomy prevalence. For example, corrected compared with uncorrected rates of uterine fibroids per 1000 women were 2.9 vs. 2.7 for ages 18-44 and 5.0 vs. 3.4 for ages 45-64. The uncorrected and corrected 10-year risk of being diagnosed with uterine fibroids among women aged 50 who have not previously had fibroids is 3.87 (1 in 26) and 4.54 (1 in 22), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The correction method employed produces greater incidence and age-conditional-risk estimates of hysterectomy and of conditions commonly treated with hysterectomy. Corrected rates and age-conditional risk estimates may allow women with intact uteri to better assess their probability of undergoing a hysterectomy and certain other conditions of the reproductive system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18280923     DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  21 in total

1.  Executive summary of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop + 10: addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging.

Authors:  Siobán D Harlow; Margery Gass; Janet E Hall; Roger Lobo; Pauline Maki; Robert W Rebar; Sherry Sherman; Patrick M Sluss; Tobie J de Villiers
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Executive summary of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop + 10: addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging.

Authors:  Siobán D Harlow; Margery Gass; Janet E Hall; Roger Lobo; Pauline Maki; Robert W Rebar; Sherry Sherman; Patrick M Sluss; Tobie J de Villiers
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Executive summary of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop + 10: addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging.

Authors:  Siobán D Harlow; Margery Gass; Janet E Hall; Roger Lobo; Pauline Maki; Robert W Rebar; Sherry Sherman; Patrick M Sluss; Tobie J de Villiers
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Hysterectomy and predictors for opioid prescription in a chronic pain clinic sample.

Authors:  Beth Darnall; Hong Li
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  Associations of Premenopausal Hysterectomy and Oophorectomy With Breast Cancer Among Black and White Women: The Carolina Breast Cancer Study, 1993-2001.

Authors:  Whitney R Robinson; Hazel B Nichols; Chiu Kit Tse; Andrew F Olshan; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Minimally invasive hysterectomies-a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists.

Authors:  Jon I Einarsson; Kristen A Matteson; Jay Schulkin; Niraj R Chavan; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  Hysterectomy and kidney cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sara Karami; Sarah E Daugherty; Mark P Purdue
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Executive summary of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop +10: addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging.

Authors:  Siobán D Harlow; Margery Gass; Janet E Hall; Roger Lobo; Pauline Maki; Robert W Rebar; Sherry Sherman; Patrick M Sluss; Tobie J de Villiers
Journal:  Climacteric       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.005

9.  Prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus among older women.

Authors:  Stacy Tessler Lindau; Melinda L Drum; Elyzabeth Gaumer; Hanna Surawska; Jeanne A Jordan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  The role of family history of cancer on cervical cancer screening behavior in a population-based survey of women in the Southeastern United States.

Authors:  Jessica D Bellinger; Heather M Brandt; James W Hardin; Shalanda A Bynum; Patricia A Sharpe; Dawnyéa Jackson
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2013-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.