Literature DB >> 18280613

Efficacy of PET/CT in the characterization of solid or partly solid solitary pulmonary nodules.

Sun Young Jeong1, Kyung Soo Lee, Kyung Min Shin, Young A Bae, Byung-Tae Kim, Bong Keun Choe, Tae Sung Kim, Myung Jin Chung.   

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of (18)fluorine fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F FDG) PET/CT for the characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) compared with the use of PET alone or CT alone. Our institutional review board approved this retrospective study with a waiver of informed consent. We selected 100 patients (M:F=56:44, mean age; 58 years) with a pathologically proven solid or partly solid SPN. Three chest radiologists assessed the nodule characteristics independently and retrospectively. Diagnostic efficacies were compared for three different approaches: consideration of CT findings only, PET findings only, and both PET and CT findings. The McNemar test, kappa statistics, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis were performed. Sixty patients had benign and 40 had malignant nodules. Overall sensitivity values for malignant SPNs for CT, PET and PET/CT were 82%, 88%, and 88%, respectively, whereas the specificity values were 66%, 71%, and 77%, respectively. PET/CT was significantly better in terms of specificity than the use of PET alone or CT alone (P<.05). The areas under curve (Az) values for the ROC analyses of PET/CT and PET alone, respectively, were larger than that of CT alone (P<.05). Interobserver agreement was moderate (kappa=0.46-0.56) for CT, good to excellent (kappa=0.78-0.90) for PET, and good for PET/CT (kappa=0.64-0.78). For the characterization of SPNs, integrated PET/CT provides significantly better specificity than CT alone or PET alone and both integrated PET/CT and PET alone allow more confidence than CT alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18280613     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.12.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  17 in total

1.  Integrating manual diagnosis into radiomics for reducing the false positive rate of 18F-FDG PET/CT diagnosis in patients with suspected lung cancer.

Authors:  Fei Kang; Wei Mu; Jie Gong; Shengjun Wang; Guoquan Li; Guiyu Li; Wei Qin; Jie Tian; Jing Wang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Clinical utility of F-18 FDG PET-CT in the initial evaluation of lung cancer.

Authors:  Poul Henning Madsen; Paw Christian Holdgaard; Janne Buck Christensen; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Differential diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules using ⁹⁹mTc-3P₄-RGD₂ scintigraphy.

Authors:  Qingjie Ma; Bin Ji; Bing Jia; Shi Gao; Tiefeng Ji; Xueju Wang; Zhenguo Han; Guoqing Zhao
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  The role of PET/CT in assessing pulmonary nodules in children with solid malignancies.

Authors:  M Beth McCarville; Catherine Billups; Jianrong Wu; Robert Kaufman; Sue Kaste; Jamie Coleman; Susan Sharp; Helen Nadel; Martin Charron; Henrique Lederman; Steven Don; Stephen Shochat; Najat C Daw; Barry Shulkin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Accuracy of FDG-PET to diagnose lung cancer in areas with infectious lung disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephen A Deppen; Jeffrey D Blume; Clark D Kensinger; Ashley M Morgan; Melinda C Aldrich; Pierre P Massion; Ronald C Walker; Melissa L McPheeters; Joe B Putnam; Eric L Grogan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Comparing the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT versus CT for differentiating benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuzhu Jia; Wanfeng Gong; Zhiping Zhang; Gaofeng Tu; Jiapeng Li; Fanfan Xiong; Hongtao Hou; Yunyi Zhang; Meiqian Wu; Liping Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  (18)F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Nodular Pulmonary Amyloidosis: Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Xiao-Qing Quan; Tie-Jun Yin; Cun-Tai Zhang; Jian Liu; Li-Fen Qiao; Chang-Shu Ke
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2014-11-28

8.  FDG PET/CT in cancer: comparison of actual use with literature-based recommendations.

Authors:  Henrik Petersen; Paw Christian Holdgaard; Poul Henning Madsen; Lene Meldgaard Knudsen; Dorte Gad; Anders Eggert Gravergaard; Max Rohde; Christian Godballe; Bodil Elisabeth Engelmann; Karsten Bech; Dorte Teilmann-Jørgensen; Ole Mogensen; Jens Karstoft; Jørgen Johansen; Janne Buck Christensen; Allan Johansen; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Functional imaging in lung cancer.

Authors:  S W Harders; S Balyasnikowa; B M Fischer
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.273

Review 10.  Solitary pulmonary nodule and (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Part 2: accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and current recommendations.

Authors:  Marcos Pretto Mosmann; Marcelle Alves Borba; Francisco Pires Negromonte de Macedo; Adriano de Araujo Lima Liguori; Arthur Villarim Neto; Kenio Costa de Lima
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.