Literature DB >> 18280381

Assessment of the relationship between the recovery of maximum mandibular opening and the maxillomandibular fixation period after orthognathic surgery.

Koichiro Ueki1, Kohei Marukawa, Yukari Hashiba, Kiyomasa Nakagawa, Kagan Degerliyurt, Etsuhide Yamamoto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in the recovery of maximum mandibular opening (MMO), and the relationship between MMO and the maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) period after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO), with and without Le Fort I osteotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with diagnosed mandibular prognathism with or without asymmetry were divided into 4 groups (SSRO, IVRO, SSRO with Le Fort I osteotomy, and IVRO with Le Fort I osteotomy). MMO and the MMF period were measured preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery. The differences among surgical procedures and the relationship between MMO and the MMF period were examined statistically.
RESULTS: In relation to time-dependent changes in MMO, there were no significant differences among the groups. There were significant positive correlations between MMO and the MMF period from 1 month to 6 months after surgery. However, there were no significant correlations at 12 and 18 months after surgery.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that there were no significant differences between single-jaw surgery and double-jaw surgery in terms of postoperative time-dependent changes in the recovery of MMO. However, the MMF period was associated with the recovery of MMO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18280381     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  7 in total

1.  Postoperative course after SSRO in mandibular asymmetries with or without MMF.

Authors:  Tomohiro Yamada; Katsuaki Mishima; Norifumi Moritani; Tatsushi Matsumura; Danilo Janune; Toshio Sugahara
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-03

2.  Prosthognathic rehabilitation of a patient with underlying skeletal discrepancy- a case report.

Authors:  Ashish R Jain; James Antony Bhagat M; Deepak Nallaswamy; Vinod Narayanan; Padma Ariga
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-03-15

Review 3.  Orthognathic surgery and temporomandibular joint symptoms.

Authors:  Hwi-Dong Jung; Sang Yoon Kim; Hyung-Sik Park; Young-Soo Jung
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-05-28

4.  The effect of botulinum toxin-A injection into the masseter muscles on prevention of plate fracture and post-operative relapse in patients receiving orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Sung-Ho Shin; Yei-Jin Kang; Seong-Gon Kim
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-11-25

5.  Three-dimensional assessment of condylar position following orthognathic surgery using the centric relation bite and the ramal reference line: A retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Chang-Hyeon Lee; Seoung-Won Cho; Ju-Won Kim; Hyo-Jung Ahn; Young-Hee Kim; Byoung-Eun Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for the Recovery of Oral Function after Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Alberto Cacho; Cristina Tordera; César Colmenero
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Emergence from Anesthesia: A Comparison between Isolated Mandibular Setback and Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgeries in Skeletal Class III Patients.

Authors:  Majid Eshghpour; Ali Reza Sharifian Attar; Ali Labafchi; Zahra Shooshtari; Fatemeh Bahramijoo; Sahand Samieirad
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2022-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.