Literature DB >> 18280015

CATCH: development of a home-based midwifery intervention to support young pregnant smokers to quit.

Anne Bryce1, Carol Butler, Wendy Gnich, Christine Sheehy, David M Tappin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to develop, implement and evaluate a supportive midwifery intervention, Community Action on Tobacco for Children's Health (CATCH), to help young pregnant smokers to quit.
DESIGN: action research project funded from April 2002 to June 2005. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: CATCH was based in a single hospital maternity unit in the West of Scotland and targeted a deprived population of pregnant smokers aged 25 years and under. Outreach work was undertaken in the local community and cessation support was provided in women's own homes. INTERVENTION: CATCH aimed to meet the particular needs of young pregnant women through a tailored, non-judgmental approach. The service was distinctive as it employed a holistic approach to smoking cessation which focused not only on individual choices and motivations, but on the wider life circumstances that may preclude behaviour change. MEASURES: internal and external teams collaborated to ensure a comprehensive evaluation, gathering of both process and outcome data. Outcomes (including self-reported and carbon monoxide validated quit status) were assessed by quantitative surveys undertaken at enrolment to the service and at 3- and 12-month follow-up. All those lost to follow-up were assumed to still be smoking. Participants' views of the service were gathered independently by an external evaluation team, and a detailed qualitative case study, capturing ongoing learning, was undertaken. Data were collected from participants who joined the project over a 16-month period (November 2002-February 2004).
FINDINGS: the study demonstrated a feasible approach to engaging young pregnant smokers to help them quit. Obstetricians and midwives were willing to refer to a service based in their maternity unit run by a specially trained midwife, and users reported a positive experience of the service. Of 152 eligible clients referred within the 16-month period, 79 (52%) joined CATCH. Of those who joined, 18 (22.8%) were self-reported non-smokers at 3 months, of whom 16 (20.3%) were validated as non-smokers using carbon monoxide monitoring. Thirteen (16.5%) clients reported being smoke free at 12 months, of whom 10 (12.7%) were validated as non-smokers at 12 months. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: CATCH suggests that close partnership with the multi-disciplinary maternity team and integration into the maternity system is invaluable for smoking cessation services targeting pregnant women. It points to the benefits of the service being delivered by a trained midwife in clients' own homes. Flexibility and a non-judgmental approach are essential to engagement. Attention to the context and wider circumstances of clients' lives and involving friends and family enables clients to focus on their own smoking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18280015     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  13 in total

1.  Are We Justified in Introducing Carbon Monoxide Testing to Encourage Smoking Cessation in Pregnant Women?

Authors:  Catherine Bowden
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2019-06

Review 2.  Community-based participatory research and smoking cessation interventions: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Jeannette O Andrews; Susan D Newman; Janie Heath; Lovoria B Williams; Martha S Tingen
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 1.208

3.  The cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David M Tappin; Linda Bauld; Carol Tannahill; Linda de Caestecker; Andrew Radley; Alex McConnachie; Kathleen Boyd; Andrew Briggs; Liz Grant; Alan Cameron; Susan Macaskill; Lesley Sinclair; Brenda Friel; Tim Coleman
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Appreciation of a Child's Journey: Implementation of a Cardiac Action Research Project.

Authors:  Kate Alexa Dengler; Valerie Wilson; Sarah Redshaw; Gabrielle Scarfe
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2012-04-29

5.  Factors influencing the uptake and use of nicotine replacement therapy and e-cigarettes in pregnant women who smoke: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Katarzyna Campbell; Thomas Coleman-Haynes; Katharine Bowker; Sue E Cooper; Sarah Connelly; Tim Coleman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-22

6.  The needs and preferences of pregnant smokers regarding tailored Internet-based smoking cessation interventions: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Aleksandra Herbec; Emma Beard; Jamie Brown; Benjamin Gardner; Ildiko Tombor; Robert West
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Exposure to active and passive smoking among Greek pregnant women.

Authors:  Victoria G Vivilaki; Athina Diamanti; Maria Tzeli; Evridiki Patelarou; Debra Bick; Sophia Papadakis; Katerina Lykeridou; Paraskevi Katsaounou
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.600

8.  Smoking prevalence and smoking cessation services for pregnant women in Scotland.

Authors:  David M Tappin; Susan MacAskill; Linda Bauld; Douglas Eadie; Debbie Shipton; Linsey Galbraith
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2010-01-21

9.  Reliability of self reported smoking status by pregnant women for estimating smoking prevalence: a retrospective, cross sectional study.

Authors:  Deborah Shipton; David M Tappin; Thenmalar Vadiveloo; Jennifer A Crossley; David A Aitken; Jim Chalmers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-10-29

10.  Pilot randomized controlled trial of an internet-based smoking cessation intervention for pregnant smokers ('MumsQuit').

Authors:  Aleksandra Herbec; Jamie Brown; Ildiko Tombor; Susan Michie; Robert West
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.