Literature DB >> 18278897

Dithiaporphyrin derivatives as photosensitizers in membranes and cells.

Refael Minnes1, Hana Weitman, Youngjae You, Michael R Detty, Benjamin Ehrenberg.   

Abstract

We synthesized a series of analogues of 5,20-diphenyl-10,15-bis(4-carboxylatomethoxy)phenyl-21,23-dithiaporphyrin (I) as potential photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy (PDT). The photosensitizers differ in the length of the side chains that bind the carboxyl to the phenol at positions 10 and 15 of the thiaporphyrin. The spectroscopic, photophysical, and biophysical properties of these photosensitizers are reported. The structural changes have almost no effect on the excitation/emission spectra with respect to I's spectra or on singlet oxygen generation in MeOH. All of the photosensitizers have a very high, close to 1.00, singlet oxygen quantum yield in MeOH. On the contrary, singlet oxygen generation in liposomes was considerably affected by the structural change in the photosensitizers. The photosensitizers possessing short side chains (one and three carbons) showed high quantum yields of around 0.7, whereas the photosensitizers possessing longer side chains showed smaller quantum yield, down to 0.14 for compound X (possessing side-chain length of 10 carbons), all at 1 microM. Moreover a self-quenching process of singlet oxygen was observed, and the quantum yield decreased as the photosensitizer's concentration increased. We measured the binding constant of I to liposomes and found Kb = 23.3 +/- 1.6 (mg/mL)-1. All the other photosensitizers with longer side chains exhibited very slow binding to liposomes, which prevented us from assessing their Kb's. We carried out fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurements to determine the relative depth in which each photosensitizer is intercalated in the liposome bilayer. We found that the longer the side chain the deeper the photosensitizer core is embedded in the bilayer. This finding suggests that the photosensitizers are bound to the bilayer with their acid ends close to the aqueous medium interface and their core inside the bilayer. We performed PDT with the dithiaporphyrins on U937 cells and R3230AC cells. We found that the dark toxicity of the photosensitizers with the longer side chain (X, VI, V) is significantly higher than the dark toxicity of sensitizers with shorter side chains (I, III, IV). Phototoxicity measurements showed the opposite direction; the photosensitizers with shorter side chains were found to be more phototoxic than those with longer side chains. These differences are attributed to the relationship between diffusion and endocytosis in each photosensitizer, which determines the location of the photosensitizer in the cell and hence its phototoxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18278897     DOI: 10.1021/jp0768423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  8 in total

1.  Comparative tumor imaging and PDT Efficacy of HPPH conjugated in the mono- and di-forms to various polymethine cyanine dyes: part - 2.

Authors:  Nadine S James; Tymish Y Ohulchanskyy; Yihui Chen; Penny Joshi; Xiang Zheng; Lalit N Goswami; Ravindra K Pandey
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 11.556

2.  A hand-held fiber-optic implement for the site-specific delivery of photosensitizer and singlet oxygen.

Authors:  Adaickapillai Mahendran; Yasemin Kopkalli; Goutam Ghosh; Ashwini Ghogare; Mihaela Minnis; Bonnie I Kruft; Matibur Zamadar; David Aebisher; Lesley Davenport; Alexander Greer
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.421

3.  Architectonics of phage-liposome nanowebs as optimized photosensitizer vehicles for photodynamic cancer therapy.

Authors:  Sreeram Kalarical Janardhanan; Shoba Narayan; Gopal Abbineni; Andrew Hayhurst; Chuanbin Mao
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  Photosensitizer (PS)-cyanine dye (CD) conjugates: Impact of the linkers joining the PS and CD moieties and their orientation in tumor-uptake and photodynamic therapy (PDT).

Authors:  Nadine S James; Penny Joshi; Tymish Y Ohulchanskyy; Yihui Chen; Walter Tabaczynski; Farukh Durrani; Masayuki Shibata; Ravindra K Pandey
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 5.  Photodynamic therapy for Barrett's esophagus: does light still have a role?

Authors:  K K Wang; L Lutzke; L Borkenhagen; W Westra; M W K Song; G Prasad; N S Buttar
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  The binding of analogs of porphyrins and chlorins with elongated side chains to albumin.

Authors:  Shimshon Ben Dror; Irena Bronshtein; Hana Weitman; Kevin M Smith; William G O'Neal; Peter A Jacobi; Benjamin Ehrenberg
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 1.733

7.  Precise Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer via Subcellular Dynamic Tracing of Dual-loaded Upconversion Nanophotosensitizers.

Authors:  Yulei Chang; Xiaodan Li; Li Zhang; Lu Xia; Xiaomin Liu; Cuixia Li; Youlin Zhang; Langping Tu; Bin Xue; Huiying Zhao; Hong Zhang; Xianggui Kong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Higher pulse frequency of near-infrared laser irradiation increases penetration depth for novel biomedical applications.

Authors:  Ayan Barbora; Oryan Bohar; Ariel Alexander Sivan; Eyal Magory; Ariel Nause; Refael Minnes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.