Literature DB >> 18277841

Accuracy of a state immunization registry in the pediatric emergency department.

Dawn S Stecher1, Raymond Adelman, Traci Brinkman, Blake Bulloch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether either parental recall or a state immunization registry was as accurate as the medical record in determining immunization status in the emergency department (ED).
METHODS: A convenience sample of children younger than 5 years who presented to the ED between July 2004 and May 2005 were enrolled prospectively. After obtaining informed consent, parents were asked about their child's immunization status. All children then had their immunization data accessed in the Arizona State Immunization Information System. The information obtained from the state registry, as well as the information from the parental interview, was then compared with the information on the medical record obtained from the primary care physician (PCP). Data were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: A total of 332 children were enrolled in the study. A total of 302 (91%) children enrolled were found in the state database, and 222 (74%) of these had a medical record available for comparison. The database agreed with the PCP record in 130 (59%) cases; parental report agreed with the PCP record in 149 (62%) cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Although most children can be found in the state immunization registry, it seems to be similar in accuracy to parental recall of immunization status when each is compared with the medical record. This may have been due to either underreporting of immunizations from the community or a delay in updating the state database. At this time, neither parental recall nor the database would accurately determine a child's immunization status during an ED visit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18277841     DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318163db4d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care        ISSN: 0749-5161            Impact factor:   1.454


  7 in total

1.  Concordance of adolescent human papillomavirus vaccination parental report with provider report in the National Immunization Survey-Teen (2008-2013).

Authors:  Jacqueline Hirth; Yong-Fang Kuo; Tabassum Haque Laz; Jonathan M Starkey; Richard E Rupp; Mahbubur Rahman; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Effects of automated immunization registry reporting via an electronic health record deployed in community practice settings.

Authors:  J Merrill; A Phillips; J Keeling; R Kaushal; Y Senathirajah
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  The effect of policy changes on hepatitis A vaccine uptake in Arizona children, 1995-2008.

Authors:  Kacey C Ernst; Kristen Pogreba-Brown; Lisa Rasmussen; Laura M Erhart
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Evaluation of the frequency of immunization information system use for public health research.

Authors:  Eileen A Curran; Robert A Bednarczyk; Saad B Omer
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Verifying influenza and pneumococcal immunization status of children in 2009-2010 from primary care practice records and from the North Carolina Immunization Registry.

Authors:  Katherine A Poehling; Lauren Vannoy; Timothy R Peters
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  2013 May-Jun

6.  The pot calling the kettle black: the extent and type of errors in a computerized immunization registry and by parent report.

Authors:  Shannon E MacDonald; Donald P Schopflocher; Richard P Golonka
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 2.125

7.  Quality and integration of public health information systems: A systematic review focused on immunization and vital records systems.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Hilary M Kirk; L Michele Issel
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2012-09-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.