Literature DB >> 18277318

Prognostic value of home blood pressure measurement.

George S Stergiou1, Petros G Kalogeropoulos, Nikos M Baibas.   

Abstract

Although self-monitoring of blood pressure by patients at home is being widely used in clinical practice, the evidence on its prognostic value is still limited. Five long-term studies with nearly 60,000 patients/year have provided prognostic information for home blood pressure measurements. Differences exist among these studies regarding the population characteristics, the sample size and follow-up, the methodology and protocol for office and home blood pressure measurement and the adjustment procedure for other risk factors. All these studies, nevertheless, showed systolic home blood pressure to be a significant predictor of cardiovascular risk, and three of them also showed prognostic value of diastolic home blood pressure. Moreover, the prognostic value of home blood pressure appeared to be consistently superior to that of conventional office measurements. The prognostic significance of the white coat and the masked hypertension phenomena detected by home measurements were investigated in two studies, one in treated hypertensive patients and another in a general population sample. These studies showed that patients with white-coat phenomenon have similar cardiovascular risk as those with low office and home blood pressure, whereas the masked hypertension phenomenon is associated with high risk as in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. In conclusion, the available evidence suggests that home blood pressure has strong prognostic value, which appears to be superior to that of the conventional office measurements. More outcome studies on the prognostic value of home blood pressure, however, are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18277318     DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32824958d1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  4 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in automated blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Prevalence of clinical and ambulatory hypertension in a population of 65-year-olds: the PROOF study.

Authors:  Philippe Gosse; Virginie Dauphinot; Frederic Roche; Vincent Pichot; Sebastien Celle; Jean-Claude Barthelemy
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Comparison of office, ambulatory, and home blood pressure antihypertensive response to atenolol and hydrochlorthiazide.

Authors:  Amber L Beitelshees; Yan Gong; Kent R Bailey; Stephen T Turner; Arlene B Chapman; Gary L Schwartz; John G Gums; Eric Boerwinkle; Julie A Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Ambulatory or home measurement of blood pressure?

Authors:  Philippe Gosse; Paul Coulon
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.