Literature DB >> 1827726

Anthropometric indicators of endometrial cancer risk.

C La Vecchia1, F Parazzini, E Negri, M Fasoli, A Gentile, S Franceschi.   

Abstract

The relation between selected anthropometric indicators and the risk of endometrial cancer was evaluated using data from a case-control study conducted in Northern Italy on 562 cases and 1780 controls in hospital for acute, non-neoplastic or hormone-related disease. There was no appreciable association between height and endometrial cancer: compared with the lowest quintile, the multivariate relative risks (RR) were 0.9, 0.9, 0.7 and 0.8 for each subsequent quintile. Weight was directly associated with risk (RR = 2.7 for top vs. bottom quintile), and the positive association was even stronger when indices of body mass which make allowance for height were considered: the relative risks for extreme quintiles were 3.4 for W/H2 (Quetelet's index, weight and height), 3.8 for W/H1.5 and 3.5 for W0.33/H. Surface area, which was positively correlated both with height and weight, showed a weaker direct association (RR = 2.4 between extreme quintiles). The relations with measures of body weight were apparently stronger in postmenopause, but the point estimates for the upper quintile were also around 2 in premenopausal women. Although the major findings of this study are not new, they provide more detailed information that was hitherto available on the relation between various anthropometric indicators and endometrial cancer risk. In relation to height, with the sample size of this study it was possible to exclude, at the conventional 95% probability, relative risks above 1.0 for the fourth and above 1.1 for the fifth as compared with the lowest quintile. This provides indirect evidence against the hypothesis that nutritional status early in life is related to the subsequent development of endometrial cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1827726     DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90392-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  5 in total

1.  Nutrition: the need to define "optimal" intake as a basis for public policy decisions.

Authors:  E L Wynder; J H Weisburger; S K Ng
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Nutrition and endometrial cancer.

Authors:  H A Hill; H Austin
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Mediterranean diet and risk of endometrial cancer: a pooled analysis of three Italian case-control studies.

Authors:  M Filomeno; C Bosetti; E Bidoli; F Levi; D Serraino; M Montella; C La Vecchia; A Tavani
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Relationship between Quetelet's index and cancer of breast and female genital tract in 47,000 women followed for 25 years.

Authors:  S A Törnberg; J M Carstensen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Body mass, diabetes and smoking, and endometrial cancer risk: a follow-up study.

Authors:  K Lindemann; L J Vatten; M Ellstrøm-Engh; A Eskild
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.