Literature DB >> 18275674

Measurement of breath hydrogen and methane, together with lactase genotype, defines the current best practice for investigation of lactose sensitivity.

Jonathan P Waud1, Stephanie B Matthews, Anthony K Campbell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no 'gold standard' for detecting patients with sensitivity to lactose. Biochemical investigation by a breath hydrogen test alone detects <50% cases. Breath methane and symptoms are not recorded as standard practice. The clinical value of analysing C/T(13910) and G/A(22018) polymorphisms, strongly associated with lactose sensitivity, has not been established.
METHODS: Two hundred and ten patients with unexplained gut and systemic symptoms and controls were challenged with 50 g lactose. Breath hydrogen and methane were measured and symptoms recorded. All were genotyped for two polymorphisms, C/T(13910) and G/A(22018).
RESULTS: CC(13910)/GG(22018) in 14.5%, CT(13910)/GA(22018) in 39% and TT(13910)/AA(22018) in 46.5%. One hundred percent of CC(13910)/GG(22018) were lactose sensitive having a breath hydrogen >20 ppm within 6 h and symptoms. But the breath hydrogen test lacked sensitivity and specificity in the other groups. There was elevated breath hydrogen in 21% of CT(13910)/GA(22018) and 15% of TT(13910)/AA(22018) by 6 h, whereas 17 and 30.9% had elevated breath methane alone. Breath methane and breath hydrogen with clinical symptoms improved sensitivity and specificity, increasing detection of lactose sensitivity in genotypes CT/GA and TT/AA from <50 to >75%.
CONCLUSIONS: The data presented define the current best practice for the clinical identification of lactose sensitivity. Patients were first genotyped. Those identified as CC with symptoms should immediately undertake a 12-week lactose-free diet. Those identified as CT or TT should undertake a breath hydrogen and methane test. Those positive for hydrogen or methane along with symptoms or with symptoms only, should also undertake a lactose-free diet. Those with high hydrogen without symptoms should be investigated for causes other than lactose sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18275674     DOI: 10.1258/acb.2007.007147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0004-5632            Impact factor:   2.057


  7 in total

1.  Lack of effect of lactose digestion status on baseline fecal micoflora.

Authors:  Andrew Szilagyi; Ian Shrier; George Chong; Jung Sung Je; Sunghoon Park; Debra Heilpern; Catherine Lalonde; Louis-Francois Cote; Byong Lee
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 2.  Adult lactose digestion status and effects on disease.

Authors:  Andrew Szilagyi
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-04

Review 3.  Update on diagnostic value of breath test in gastrointestinal and liver diseases.

Authors:  Imran Siddiqui; Sibtain Ahmed; Shahab Abid
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-08-15

4.  Additional Value of CH₄ Measurement in a Combined (13)C/H₂ Lactose Malabsorption Breath Test: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Els Houben; Vicky De Preter; Jaak Billen; Marc Van Ranst; Kristin Verbeke
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Contribution of Colonic Fermentation and Fecal Water Toxicity to the Pathophysiology of Lactose-Intolerance.

Authors:  Karen Windey; Els Houben; Lise Deroover; Kristin Verbeke
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Evaluation of breath, plasma, and urinary markers of lactose malabsorption to diagnose lactase non-persistence following lactose or milk ingestion.

Authors:  Aahana Shrestha; Matthew P G Barnett; Jo K Perry; David Cameron-Smith; Amber M Milan
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Intake of dairy protein during pregnancy in IBD and risk of SGA in a Norwegian population-based mother and child cohort.

Authors:  May-Bente Bengtson; Margaretha Haugen; Anne Lise Brantsæter; Geir Aamodt; Morten H Vatn
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.067

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.