Literature DB >> 18275336

Odd sound processing in the sleeping brain.

Perrine Ruby1, Anne Caclin, Sabrina Boulet, Claude Delpuech, Dominique Morlet.   

Abstract

How does the sleeping brain process external stimuli, and in particular, up to which extent does the sleeping brain detect and process modifications in its sensory environment? In order to address this issue, we investigated brain reactivity to simple auditory stimulations during sleep in young healthy subjects. Electroencephalogram signal was acquired continuously during a whole night of sleep while a classical oddball paradigm with duration deviance was applied. In all sleep stages, except Sleep Stage 4, a mismatch negativity (MMN) was unquestionably found in response to deviant tones, revealing for the first time preserved sensory memory processing during almost the whole night. Surprisingly, during Sleep Stage 2 and paradoxical sleep, both P3a-like and P3b-like components were identified after the MMN, whereas a P3a alone followed the MMN in wakefulness and in Sleep Stage 1. This totally new result suggests elaborated processing of external stimulation during sleep. We propose that the P3b-like response could be associated to an active processing of the deviant tone in the dream's consciousness.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18275336     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  22 in total

1.  Auditory evoked potentials and impairments to psychomotor activity evoked by falling asleep.

Authors:  V B Dorokhov; Yu S Verbitskaya; T P Lavrova
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-03-26

Review 2.  Cholinergic cells of the pontomesencephalic tegmentum: connections with auditory structures from cochlear nucleus to cortex.

Authors:  Brett R Schofield; Susan D Motts; Jeffrey G Mellott
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Neural Markers of Responsiveness to the Environment in Human Sleep.

Authors:  Thomas Andrillon; Andreas Trier Poulsen; Lars Kai Hansen; Damien Léger; Sid Kouider
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Shift work sleep disorder is associated with an attenuated brain response of sensory memory and an increased brain response to novelty: an ERP study.

Authors:  Valentina Gumenyuk; Thomas Roth; Oleg Korzyukov; Catherine Jefferson; Ashley Kick; Laura Spear; Norman Tepley; Christopher L Drake
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.849

5.  Auditory responses and stimulus-specific adaptation in rat auditory cortex are preserved across NREM and REM sleep.

Authors:  Yuval Nir; Vladyslav V Vyazovskiy; Chiara Cirelli; Matthew I Banks; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  MMN and novelty P3 in coma and other altered states of consciousness: a review.

Authors:  Dominique Morlet; Catherine Fischer
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Dynamic Interactions between Top-Down Expectations and Conscious Awareness.

Authors:  Erik L Meijs; Heleen A Slagter; Floris P de Lange; Simon van Gaal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Disruption of hierarchical predictive coding during sleep.

Authors:  Melanie Strauss; Jacobo D Sitt; Jean-Remi King; Maxime Elbaz; Leila Azizi; Marco Buiatti; Lionel Naccache; Virginie van Wassenhove; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  "What" and "where" in auditory sensory processing: a high-density electrical mapping study of distinct neural processes underlying sound object recognition and sound localization.

Authors:  Victoria M Leavitt; Sophie Molholm; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; John J Foxe
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22

10.  Acoustic oddball during NREM sleep: a combined EEG/fMRI study.

Authors:  Michael Czisch; Renate Wehrle; Andrea Stiegler; Henning Peters; Katia Andrade; Florian Holsboer; Philipp G Sämann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.