Literature DB >> 18274623

Field Test of an Epidemiology Curriculum for Middle School Students.

Mark A Kaelin1, Wendy W Huebner, Mark J Nicolich, Maudellyn L Kimbrough.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of a middle school epidemiology curriculum called Detectives in the Classroom. The curriculum presents epidemiology as the science of public health, using health-related issues that capture the interest of young students and help prepare them to make evidence-based health-related decisions. The curriculum was field tested among seventh-grade urban students using a quasi-experimental design. Analysis of covariance of pre- and post-test scores examined five outcomes, including students' perceptions of their abilities in science as inquiry, scientific literacy, and knowledge about five enduring epidemiologic understandings; their self reported interest in science, and assessment of students' epidemiological reasoning ability. The 378 experimental students, compared to 620 controls, had generally higher post-test improvements in epidemiology-related outcomes and smaller increases in the other measures. A dose-response was suggested by higher scores among students exposed to more than 10 lessons. Strengths of this evaluation include a large sample and availability of data to account for differences in demographic and school performance variables. Limitations of this evaluation include randomization by school as opposed to student, the relatively short-term and generally self-reported outcomes, and inconsistencies in proportion of the curriculum actually taught. The findings offer encouragement about the potential for Detectives in the Classroom to improve students' perceptions of their science abilities and scientific literacy, their interest in science and their abilities in basic epidemiologic reasoning. Further tests of this and other epidemiology curricula are needed to respond to the growing interest in teaching public health science to younger students. And while it is important to test near-term impacts, an additional challenge from a curriculum evaluation standpoint will be to follow students over several years to examine subsequent choices concerning selected courses, college majors, and career paths.

Year:  2007        PMID: 18274623      PMCID: PMC2243259          DOI: 10.1080/19325037.2007.10598938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Educ        ISSN: 1932-5037


  1 in total

1.  Epidemiology as a liberal art.

Authors:  D W Fraser
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-02-05       Impact factor: 91.245

  1 in total
  6 in total

1.  Early Preparation and Inspiration for STEM Careers: Preliminary Report of the Epidemiology Challenge Randomized Intervention, 2014-2015.

Authors:  Robin Taylor Wilson; Emma Watson; Mark Kaelin; Wendy Huebner
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  A multimedia educational program that increases science achievement among inner-city non-Asian minority middle-school students.

Authors:  Nancy G Murray; Kwame A Opuni; Belinda Reininger; Nathalie Sessions; Melanie M Mowry; Mary Hobbs
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 3.  Effects of School-Based Educational Interventions for Enhancing Adolescents Abilities in Critical Appraisal of Health Claims: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lena V Nordheim; Malene W Gundersen; Birgitte Espehaug; Øystein Guttersrud; Signe Flottorp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Interventions and assessment tools addressing key concepts people need to know to appraise claims about treatment effects: a systematic mapping review.

Authors:  Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren; Allen Nsangi; Daniel Semakula
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-29

5.  Establishing a library of resources to help people understand key concepts in assessing treatment claims-The "Critical thinking and Appraisal Resource Library" (CARL).

Authors:  John C Castle; Iain Chalmers; Patricia Atkinson; Douglas Badenoch; Andrew D Oxman; Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren; Lena Nordheim; L Kendall Krause; Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Amanda Burls; Paola Mosconi; Tammy Hoffmann; Leila Cusack; Loai Albarqouni; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Educational interventions to improve people's understanding of key concepts in assessing the effects of health interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leila Cusack; Chris B Del Mar; Iain Chalmers; Elizabeth Gibson; Tammy C Hoffmann
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.