STUDY OBJECTIVES: The relationship between memory enhancement and fast (13-16 Hz) versus slow (10-13 Hz) spindle activity during sleep was investigated. DESIGN: Standard polysomnographic recordings were conducted during an adaptation, control nonlearning, and learning night. Automatic spindle detection and measurement was utilized with visual confirmation. SETTING: Participants slept in individual, temperature-controlled bedrooms in a sleep laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve healthy student volunteers (9 women and 3 men, mean age: 22.3 years) participated. INTERVENTIONS: On the learning night, participants completed a presleep learning session on a modified version of mirror-tracing task followed by a postsleep test session. No learning or test sessions were performed on the adaptation and nonlearning nights. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Tracing time was reduced by 6.4 seconds (20.6% +/- 2.07%) from the presleep to the postsleep session. Mean amplitude and duration of fast spindles was greater on the learning night than on the nonlearning night (both P values < 0.05). Skill improvement and fast-spindle activity were positively correlated (density [r = 0.76, P < 0.01], amplitude [r = 0.69, P < 0.05], and duration [r = 0.67, P <0.05]). Significant correlations between fast-spindle activity and mirror-tracing performance were also evident for the nonlearning night. There was no significant relationship between mirror-tracing performance and slow-spindle activity on any night. CONCLUSIONS: The thalamocortical network underlying fast-spindle generation may contribute to or reflect plasticity during sleep.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: The relationship between memory enhancement and fast (13-16 Hz) versus slow (10-13 Hz) spindle activity during sleep was investigated. DESIGN: Standard polysomnographic recordings were conducted during an adaptation, control nonlearning, and learning night. Automatic spindle detection and measurement was utilized with visual confirmation. SETTING:Participants slept in individual, temperature-controlled bedrooms in a sleep laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve healthy student volunteers (9 women and 3 men, mean age: 22.3 years) participated. INTERVENTIONS: On the learning night, participants completed a presleep learning session on a modified version of mirror-tracing task followed by a postsleep test session. No learning or test sessions were performed on the adaptation and nonlearning nights. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Tracing time was reduced by 6.4 seconds (20.6% +/- 2.07%) from the presleep to the postsleep session. Mean amplitude and duration of fast spindles was greater on the learning night than on the nonlearning night (both P values < 0.05). Skill improvement and fast-spindle activity were positively correlated (density [r = 0.76, P < 0.01], amplitude [r = 0.69, P < 0.05], and duration [r = 0.67, P <0.05]). Significant correlations between fast-spindle activity and mirror-tracing performance were also evident for the nonlearning night. There was no significant relationship between mirror-tracing performance and slow-spindle activity on any night. CONCLUSIONS: The thalamocortical network underlying fast-spindle generation may contribute to or reflect plasticity during sleep.
Authors: Matthew P Walker; Tiffany Brakefield; Joshua Seidman; Alexandra Morgan; J Allan Hobson; Robert Stickgold Journal: Learn Mem Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.460
Authors: Carmen E Westerberg; Bryce A Mander; Susan M Florczak; Sandra Weintraub; M-Marsel Mesulam; Phyllis C Zee; Ken A Paller Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Erin J Wamsley; Ann K Shinn; Matthew A Tucker; Kim E Ono; Sophia K McKinley; Alice V Ely; Donald C Goff; Robert Stickgold; Dara S Manoach Journal: Sleep Date: 2013-09-01 Impact factor: 5.849