Literature DB >> 18274219

The effect of self-regulated and experimenter-imposed practice schedules on motor learning for tasks of varying difficulty.

Katherine M Keetch1, Timothy D Lee.   

Abstract

Research suggests that allowing individuals to control their own practice schedule has a positive effect on motor learning. In this experiment we examined the effect of task difficulty and self-regulated practice strategies on motor learning. The task was to move a mouse-operated cursor through pattern arrays that differed in two levels of difficulty. Participants learned either four easy or hard patterns after assignment to one of four groups that ordered practice in blocked, random, self-regulated, and yoked-to-self-regulated schedules. Although self-regulation provided no special benefit in acquisition, these groups showed the most improved performance in retention, irrespective of task difficulty. Although individual switch strategies for members of the self-regulated groups were quite variable, the impact of self-regulation on motor learning remained similar. These findings add to the growing body of literature suggesting that self-regulated practice is an important variable for motor learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18274219     DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2007.10599447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport        ISSN: 0270-1367            Impact factor:   2.500


  12 in total

1.  The effects of self-controlled video feedback on the learning of the basketball set shot.

Authors:  Christopher Adam Aiken; Jeffrey T Fairbrother; Phillip Guy Post
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-09-11

2.  Understanding Self-Controlled Motor Learning Protocols through the Self-Determination Theory.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sanli; Jae T Patterson; Steven R Bray; Timothy D Lee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-11

3.  Kinematic strategies underlying improvement in the acquisition of a sequential finger task with self-generated vs. Cued repetition training.

Authors:  Jason Friedman; Maria Korman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Too much of a good thing: random practice scheduling and self-control of feedback lead to unique but not additive learning benefits.

Authors:  Asif Ali; Bradley Fawver; Jingu Kim; Jeffrey Fairbrother; Christopher M Janelle
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-10

5.  Reduction of Feedback Availability Limits Self-Control Effects.

Authors:  Aaron D von Lindern; Jeffrey T Fairbrother
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-03-29

6.  Learner-Controlled Self-Observation is Advantageous for Motor Skill Acquisition.

Authors:  Diane M Ste-Marie; Kelly A Vertes; Barbi Law; Amanda M Rymal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-17

7.  Self-controlled learning: the importance of protecting perceptions of competence.

Authors:  Suzete Chiviacowsky; Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-02

8.  Self-controlled practice and nudging during structural learning of a novel control interface.

Authors:  Mei-Hua Lee; Shanie A L Jayasinghe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Size Perception of a Sport Target as a Function of Practice Success Conditions.

Authors:  Krystina Bianchi; Molly Brillinger; Jae Todd Patterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-18

Review 10.  The Ecological Dynamics Framework: An Innovative Approach to Performance in Extreme Environments: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ludovic Seifert; Guillaume Hacques; John Komar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.