Literature DB >> 18274096

[Diagnostics of Lyme disease].

Jacek Gasiorowski1, Elzbieta Witecka-Knysz, Brygida Knysz, Hanna Gerber, Andrzej Gładysz.   

Abstract

Although many years have passed since Borrelia burgdorferi was first identified, advances in understanding biology and clinical course of infection made and new diagnostic procedures developed, Lyme disease is still difficult to diagnose. Therefore, it is often wrongly diagnosed and unnecessarily treated. In this paper we analyzed the latest data on Lyme disease diagnostic methods, paying much attention to their limitations and correct interpretation of results. In routine diagnosis of this diseases, indirect tests, based on the detection of specific IgM and IgG antibodies, are most useful. The Lyme disease diagnosis should begin with screening tests, which are highly sensitive but not specific enough and sometimes yield false positive results, then all positive results should be verified by confirmation tests, which allow to distinguish between true positive results and healthy individuals with false positive ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18274096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Pr        ISSN: 0465-5893            Impact factor:   0.760


  1 in total

1.  Lyme disease: review.

Authors:  Grażyna Biesiada; Jacek Czepiel; Maciej R Leśniak; Aleksander Garlicki; Tomasz Mach
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.318

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.