Literature DB >> 18273657

Temporal resolution of orientation-defined texture segregation: a VEP study.

Julie Lachapelle1, Michelle McKerral, Colin Jauffret, Michael Bach.   

Abstract

Orientation is one of the visual dimensions that subserve figure-ground discrimination. A spatial gradient in orientation leads to "texture segregation", which is thought to be concurrent parallel processing across the visual field, without scanning. In the visual-evoked potential (VEP) a component can be isolated which is related to texture segregation ("tsVEP"). Our objective was to evaluate the temporal frequency dependence of the tsVEP to compare processing speed of low-level features (e.g., orientation, using the VEP, here denoted llVEP) with texture segregation because of a recent literature controversy in that regard. Visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded in seven normal adults. Oriented line segments of 0.1 degrees x 0.8 degrees at 100% contrast were presented in four different arrangements: either oriented in parallel for two homogeneous stimuli (from which were obtained the low-level VEP (llVEP)) or with a 90 degrees orientation gradient for two textured ones (from which were obtained the texture VEP). The orientation texture condition was presented at eight different temporal frequencies ranging from 7.5 to 45 Hz. Fourier analysis was used to isolate low-level components at the pattern-change frequency and texture-segregation components at half that frequency. For all subjects, there was lower high-cutoff frequency for tsVEP than for llVEPs, on average 12 Hz vs. 17 Hz (P = 0.017). The results suggest that the processing of feature gradients to extract texture segregation requires additional processing time, resulting in a lower fusion frequency.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18273657      PMCID: PMC5153326          DOI: 10.1007/s10633-008-9117-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  20 in total

1.  Response modulation by texture surround in primate area V1: correlates of "popout" under anesthesia.

Authors:  H C Nothdurft; J L Gallant; D C Van Essen
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Salience from feature contrast: temporal properties of saliency mechanisms.

Authors:  H Nothdurft
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision.

Authors:  H C Nothdurft
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

4.  Visual evoked potentials standard (2004).

Authors:  J Vernon Odom; Michael Bach; Colin Barber; Mitchell Brigell; Michael F Marmor; Alma Patrizia Tormene; Graham E Holder
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Guideline 5: Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.177

6.  Texture segregation and orientation gradient.

Authors:  M S Landy; J R Bergen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Orientation sensitivity and texture segmentation in patterns with different line orientation.

Authors:  H C Nothdurft
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Perceptual grouping produced by changes in orientation and shape.

Authors:  J Beck
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Texture segregation in traumatic brain injury--a VEP study.

Authors:  Julie Lachapelle; Catherine Ouimet; Michael Bach; Alain Ptito; Michelle McKerral
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.