R Beigi1, J Hanrahan. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. rbeigi@mail.magee.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine colonization rates of Staphylococcus aureus given the potential for future intervention trials aimed at reducing surgical-site infectious morbidity, and to estimate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) rates in our patient population. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective pilot investigation comprising data from 104 gravidas admitted to an urban labor and delivery unit. All underwent anterior nares culture collection with a subset also undergoing vaginal culture collection. RESULTS: Twenty-two percent of women were colonized in the anterior nares. Of the 28 women who had vaginal cultures collected, 4/28 (14.2%) demonstrated Staphylococcus aureus colonization. There was 82% concordance between the nares and vagina. Nine percent of isolates were MRSA strains. Overall, 2/96 (2.1%) of women were MRSA-colonized. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of Staphylococcus aureus colonization among gravidas entering labor and delivery are modest and consistent with the general population. MRSA rates among gravidas appear to be reassuringly low in this pilot study.
OBJECTIVE: To determine colonization rates of Staphylococcus aureus given the potential for future intervention trials aimed at reducing surgical-site infectious morbidity, and to estimate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) rates in our patient population. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective pilot investigation comprising data from 104 gravidas admitted to an urban labor and delivery unit. All underwent anterior nares culture collection with a subset also undergoing vaginal culture collection. RESULTS: Twenty-two percent of women were colonized in the anterior nares. Of the 28 women who had vaginal cultures collected, 4/28 (14.2%) demonstrated Staphylococcus aureus colonization. There was 82% concordance between the nares and vagina. Nine percent of isolates were MRSA strains. Overall, 2/96 (2.1%) of women were MRSA-colonized. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of Staphylococcus aureus colonization among gravidas entering labor and delivery are modest and consistent with the general population. MRSA rates among gravidas appear to be reassuringly low in this pilot study.
Staphylococcus aureus is a common
bacterial pathogen frequently found to colonize skin, anterior nares, or
perineum in humans. Nasal carriage rates
are 25–50% in the general population [1, 2]. S.
aureus is a major cause of skin and surgical-site infections, and is one of
the most common causes of healthcare-associated infections. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) has been a growing problem in
healthcare facilities since the 1960s, and has become gradually more difficult
to treat due to increasing resistance [3].MRSA was once
considered to be a problem primarily related to transmission in healthcare
facilities due to cross-transmission on the hands of healthcare workers [4]. However, in the last ten years, there have
been multiple outbreaks MRSA in people with no direct contact with healthcare
settings, and no apparent risk factors for acquiring MRSA [5]. Community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) infections have
been increasingly reported, including invasive infections in children, outbreaks
in correctional settings, athletic teams, and among men who have sex with men [5]. CA-MRSA infection has been recognized
worldwide, and its increase poses serious implications for hospitals in that
the pool of individuals colonized with MRSA will likely increase with
subsequent increased potential for spread in hospitals.The carriage rate for S. aureus and MRSA among women presenting for obstetric care has
not been recently evaluated. An evaluation
published in 1978 of S. aureus nasal
colonization among asymptomatic gravidas admitted to labor and delivery
documented a 4% colonization rate [6]. The importance of S. aureus colonization as a marker for subsequent surgical-site
infectious morbidity is well documented [7, 8]. S.
aureus is thought to be a causative agent in roughly 25–50% of cesarean
section infectious wound morbidity and puerperal mastitis [9]. With the ever-increasing rates of cesarean
delivery, recognition of potentially modifiable risk factors for surgical-site
infectious morbidity becomes imperative.MRSA is a cause of invasive disease in infants
in neonatal intensive care units. The existence of MRSA colonization in
pregnant women has potential serious implications for newborns [10-12],
and may cause an increased rate of infection in both pregnant women and
infants. Despite the potential
implications, a paucity of data currently exists addressing MRSA rates among
gravidas. In light of these concerns a
pilot investigation into the prevalence of S.
aureus and MRSA colonization in women presenting to the labor and delivery
for labor management or scheduled cesarean section was undertaken.
2. METHODS
2.1. Patient population
This was a prospectively
enrolled cohort analysis of 104 gravidas admitted to labor and delivery for
labor management or scheduled cesarean section from April 2005 thru March 2006
at MetroHealth Medical Center (Cleveland, Ohio, USA). MetroHealth Medical Center is the Cuyahoga County public hospital, serving predominantly the inner-city metropolitan Cleveland area. The protocol was approved by the MetroHealth Medical Center
institutional review board and all patients underwent informed consent.Women who met the
following inclusion criteria were approached for enrollment by a trained member
of the research staff: gestational age at or beyond 24 weeks, were being
admitted for labor management or scheduled cesarean section, and had intact
amniotic membranes. Women were excluded
if they had used antibiotics in the week preceding enrollment or had already
received a pelvic exam that day with the use of bacteriostatic lubricant
gel.
At enrollment, demographic data
including age, race, gestational age, and occupation including contact with
health-care facilities or health-care personnel was obtained. All women had anterior nares swabs collected
for S. aureus culture, and a subset also had swabs collected from the
outer third of the vagina for S. aureus culture. Women received
their regular care as per obstetric indication and no further follow-up took
place during the incident hospitalization.At 3 months
postpartum the comprehensive clinical care computer database was searched for
any visits the enrolled women received in the MetroHealth system after delivery
pertaining to infectious morbidity. In
addition, all women were contacted by phone by the trained research assistant to
inquire into infectious conditions they experienced since delivery that may
have been attributable to S. aureus. Specifically, women were asked if they had
been diagnosed by a health professional with either a surgical wound infection
(for cesarean delivery patients) or mastitis.
Women who reported puerperal infectious morbidity to the research
personnel on the phone or who were noted to have had a visit in the
computerized medical record addressing one of these infections were compared to
women without, stratified by S. aureus colonization status.
2.2. Microbiology
Swabs from both the anterior nares and vagina were
cultivated for Staphylococcus aureus in the following manner at the MetroHealth Medical Center microbiology
laboratory: swabs were plated on TSA
II 5% Sheep's Blood agar (manufacturer:
BBL). Plates were then incubated at C
in 5% CO2 and examined daily for growth.
Colonies showing a typical Staphylococcus morphology were tested for bound coagulase using a slide agglutination test
with rabbit plasma “clumping factor.”
Colonies demonstrating positive agglutination in plasma were retested
with a saline-negative control to confirm absence of autoagglutination . Equivocal
“clumping factor” tests were resolved with a Tube Coagulase Test read
at 24 hours of incubation. The plates were held 72 hours before cultures were
resulted as negative. S. aureus isolates, then, underwent
antimicrobial susceptibility testing via broth microdilution using a Vitek
I. MRSA strains were identified as those
demonstrating an MIC value of ≥ 4mg/dL to oxacillin (Clinical and
Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Performance standards for antimicrobial
susceptibility testing (Wayne, Pa, USA); 2005).Collation and analysis of the data was
performed using StatView (version 5.0.1, SAS Institute Inc., (Cary, NC,
USA)). Summary statistics were used for
description of the data where appropriate.
Fishers’ exact testing for differences in proportions was used where
appropriate.
3. RESULTS
Of the 104 women enrolled,
culture data is available on 96 (92.3%).This represents approximately 3.5%
of the women delivering at the institution over the time period of the
study. The demographic data is displayed
in Table 1. Most of the women presented at or near term,
and a large percentage were admitted for scheduled repeat cesarean section
delivery.
Table 1
Demographics N-96
Age (years)
Mean
26
Range
18–41
Race n (%)
Caucasian
46 (48%)
A. A.
36
(38%)
Latina
13 (13%)
Asian
1 (1%)
Gestational age (weeks)
Mean
37
Range
30–41
Health-care exposure during pregnancy?
N
% Culture (+)
Yes
16 (17%)
25.0
No
80 (83%)
21.2
Delivery mode
N
% Culture (+)
Vaginal
33 (34%)
18.1
Cesarean
63 (66%)
23.8
Of
the 96 women with culture data, 21 (22.0%) were colonized with S. aureus. All but one (95.4%) of the culture-positive
women carried S. aureus in the
anterior nares. One woman harbored S. aureus in the vagina with a negative nares culture. There were seven of the nares-positive women
that also had vaginal cultures taken, and 3 of 7 (42.8%) were correspondingly positive
as well. Of the 75 women that were culture-negative
in the nares, 21 of them also had vaginal cultures available, and all but one
were culture-negative. Overall, of the
28 women with both nares and vaginal cultures available, 23 (82.1%) were
concordant.Two of the 21 (9.5%) women positive for S.
aureus carried MRSA strains (2.1% overall).
One of these women with both nares and vaginal cultures collected
demonstrated MRSA colonization at both sites.
Of the two MRSA (+) women, 1 worked in the study hospital and one denied
any direct hospital/personnel contact other than outpatient prenatal care during
the entire pregnancy prior to admission to labor and delivery.In
terms of infectious outcomes, 6 of the 96 women (6.3%) were noted to have infectious
conditions potentially attributed to S.
aureus (4 surgical wound infections and 2 cases of puerperal
mastitis). Two of the 21 S. aureus (9.5%) colonized women had
puerperal infectious morbidity versus 4 of 75 (5.3%), however, this did not
reach statistical significance (P = .61).
4. DISCUSSION
This pilot investigation is the
first study identified in nearly 30 years addressing S. aureus nasal colonization rates among otherwise uncomplicated
gravidas entering labor and delivery. We
documented a modest overall S. aureus colonization rate of 22%, of which nearly 10% were MRSA strains. The S.
aureus nares colonization rate in this report approaches other published
reports of the general population of 25–50% [1, 2]. These findings could serve as a foundation
for future intervention trials using topical antimicrobials to decrease
surgical-site infectious morbidity in patients increasingly undergoing
scheduled cesarean delivery. Our overall
MRSA colonization rate of 2.1% approximates the 0.8% rate noted from 2001–2002
national data [5]. This was a
small pilot study and is informative although it may not be generalizable to
the entire pregnant population.The overall S. aureus nares colonization rate of
22.0% noted in this study is higher than the only other investigation addressing
nasal colonization among asymptomatic gravidas, noting a 4.0% S. aureus nasal colonization in 1978 [6].
Chen et al. recently published S. aureus colonization rates from rectovaginal specimens collected for routine group B
streptococcus (GBS) cultures done between 35–37 weeks of gestation and found
that 17.1% of nearly 3000 women also had evidence for genital S. aureus colonization [13]. The subset of our women who had vaginal
cultures performed (N = 28) showed a comparable rate of 4/28 (14.2%) genital
tract S. aureus colonization. The main goal of this investigation was to delineate nasal S. aureus and MRSA colonization rates
as a foundation for potential intervention trials using intranasal
antimicrobials given the ever-increasing rates of cesarean delivery with its
attendant surgical site morbidity. To
this end, the vaginal colonization data was secondary, and is mentioned as a
corollary to nasal colonization in a subset of women to address concordance in
colonization sites.Too few infectious
outcomes with no direct incident culture data were detected in this pilot
investigation to make any meaningful statements, however, it is worth noting
the nearly 2 fold risk seen among women who were S. aureus culture-positive.
Other patient populations have demonstrated an increase in surgical-site
and soft-tissue infectious morbidity among those colonized with S. aureus [7, 8], but this has
not been demonstrated to date in women undergoing cesarean section and/or
lactating.A related concern
is the emergence and persistence of CA-MRSA strains in the general
population. First recognized in the 1960s,
MRSA has become an important pathogen not only due to its antibiotic
susceptibility pattern making efficacious treatment challenging but also
because of the severity of MRSA skin, soft-tissue, and blood-borne infections. Recent data suggests that CA-MRSA strains
persist, placing women entering labor and delivery at risk for colonization,
infection, and nosocomial transmission and/or acquisition of MRSA [5].
The rate of 2.1% in this pilot
investigation approximates other reports and is reassuringly low, yet present
nonetheless [5, 13].A few limitations
to the current pilot study are worth noting.
This is a small study in a single locale, and thus may not be completely
generalizable to the entire obstetric population. In addition, our method of assessing postpartum
infectious morbidity was limited to patient report and/or search of an
electronic medical record for visits.
Thus, our estimates may not be entirely representative of reality. However, this was not done with knowledge of
colonization category by the research personnel conducting the medical record
search or the phone call, and is thus unlikely to be biased with regard to
colonization status. Further, we did not
investigate in this pilot study into the molecular characterization of our
strains and therefore the epidemiology can only be suggested. However, of our 2 MRSA strain-positive women,
1 denied direct hospital contact except for outpatient prenatal care, making
CA-MRSA a possibility.In
summary, this pilot study demonstrates modest and population-consistent rates
of S. aureus and MRSA colonization
rates among uncomplicated gravidas entering labor and delivery for management
of labor. Given the increasing rates of
cesarean delivery documented nationally, this population could potentially
benefit from interventions aimed at reducing surgical-site infectious morbidity
attributable to S. aureus. Continued surveillance for CA-MRSA is
warranted among this and other “low-risk” populations due to increasing reports
of prevalent strains in the community.
Authors: Natalia Jimenez-Truque; Sara Tedeschi; Elizabeth J Saye; Brian D McKenna; Weston Langdon; Jesse P Wright; Andrew Alsentzer; Sandra Arnold; Benjamin R Saville; Wenli Wang; Isaac Thomsen; C Buddy Creech Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-04-02 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Loren G Miller; Samantha J Eells; Alexis R Taylor; Michael Z David; Nancy Ortiz; Diana Zychowski; Neha Kumar; Denise Cruz; Susan Boyle-Vavra; Robert S Daum Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Karina A Top; Richard C Huard; Zachary Fox; Fann Wu; Susan Whittier; Phyllis Della-Latta; Lisa Saiman; Adam J Ratner Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Bruce Y Lee; Ann E Wiringa; Elizabeth A Mitgang; Sarah M McGlone; Abena N Afriyie; Yeohan Song; Richard H Beigi Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: James A McKinnell; Susan S Huang; Samantha J Eells; Eric Cui; Loren G Miller Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 3.254