Literature DB >> 18273220

Penetration depth limits of in vivo confocal reflectance imaging.

C L Smithpeter, A K Dunn, A J Welch, R Richards-Kortum.   

Abstract

We present experiments to predict the maximum penetration depth atwhich typical biological structures in amelanotic tissue can bedetected with confocal microscopy. The detected signal is examinedas the signal source strength (index of refraction mismatch), thesource depth, and the medium scattering coefficient are varied. Thedetected background produced by scattering outside the focal volume isexamined as the medium scattering coefficient, the depth in the medium, the dimensionless pinhole radius, nu(p), and theshape of the scattering phase function are varied. When the systemapproaches ideal confocal performance (nu(p) ? 3), the penetration depth is limited by the signal-to-noiseratio to approximately 3-4 optical depths (OD's) for a 0.05 indexmismatch. As nu(p) increases to 8, thepenetration depth is limited by the signal-to-background ratio and isdependent on the scattering coefficient. At mu(s) = 100 cm(-1) (l(s) = 100 mum) and an index mismatch of 0.05, the maximum penetrationdepth is approximately 2 OD.

Year:  1998        PMID: 18273220     DOI: 10.1364/ao.37.002749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Opt        ISSN: 1559-128X            Impact factor:   1.980


  11 in total

1.  Detection and diagnosis of oral neoplasia with an optical coherence microscope.

Authors:  A L Clark; A Gillenwater; R Alizadeh-Naderi; A K El-Naggar; R Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Reflection-contrast limit of fiber-optic image guides.

Authors:  Pierre M Lane; Calum E MacAulay
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Imaging and analysis of three-dimensional cell culture models.

Authors:  Benedikt W Graf; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

Review 4.  Optical-Based Analysis of Soft Tissue Structures.

Authors:  Will Goth; John Lesicko; Michael S Sacks; James W Tunnell
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 9.590

5.  Chromatic confocal microscopy for multi-depth imaging of epithelial tissue.

Authors:  Cory Olsovsky; Ryan Shelton; Oscar Carrasco-Zevallos; Brian E Applegate; Kristen C Maitland
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Analysis of skin lesions using laminar optical tomography.

Authors:  Timothy J Muldoon; Sean A Burgess; Brenda R Chen; Désirée Ratner; Elizabeth M C Hillman
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Handheld tunable focus confocal microscope utilizing a double-clad fiber coupler for in vivo imaging of oral epithelium.

Authors:  Cory Olsovsky; Taylor Hinsdale; Rodrigo Cuenca; Yi-Shing Lisa Cheng; John M Wright; Terry D Rees; Javier A Jo; Kristen C Maitland
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Quantifying light scattering with single-mode fiber -optic confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Jeffrey T LaCroix; Mark A Haidekker
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 1.930

9.  A coherent model for turbid imaging with confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Christopher E Glazowski; James Zavislan
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Microglial migration and interactions with dendrimer nanoparticles are altered in the presence of neuroinflammation.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Elizabeth Nance; Yossef Alnasser; Rangaramanujam Kannan; Sujatha Kannan
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 8.322

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.