Literature DB >> 18272847

Prenatal stress effects on pig development and response to weaning.

D C Lay1, H G Kattesh, J E Cunnick, M J Daniels, K A McMunn, M J Toscano, M P Roberts.   

Abstract

Exposing a pregnant sow to stress has been shown to affect the resulting offspring. Our objective was to determine if rough handling of pregnant sows altered the physiology of her offspring and if these alterations were different from an experimentally induced model of prenatal stress. Sow treatments consisted of i.v. injections of ACTH (1 IU/kg of BW), exposure to rough handling for 10 min (Rough), or no treatment (Control) once a week during d 42 to 77 of gestation. To determine the plasma cortisol response to treatments, blood (5 mL) was collected from 30 sows after treatment administration. To conduct the prenatal stress study, a separate group of 56 sows was used in 1 of 4 replicates. At birth, production data were collected for each litter, including birth weight, number born, anogenital distance, and pig viability. At weaning, pigs were blocked by BW and sex, and placed in a nursery pen of 6 pigs, with 2 pigs from each treatment group. To assess the effect of treatments on cortisol, corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), and hematological cell profiles, blood was collected every other day for 10 d after weaning. Application of treatments caused plasma cortisol concentrations to be greatest in ACTH sows compared with Control sows (P < 0.001), with Rough sows having intermediate values (P = 0.07). Treatments did not affect the number of pigs born, number of stillborn, or pig viability (P > 0.40). The ratio of cortisol to CBG did not differ between treatments (P = 0.09). Hematological variables did not differ between treatments (P > 0.19). Pigs born to ACTH sows had a smaller anogenital distance compared with controls (P < 0.03), with pigs from Rough sows being intermediate. Our data indicate that swine exposed to prenatal stress (ACTH injection) can have alterations in sexual morphology without effects on growth or the immune cell populations measured in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18272847     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  6 in total

1.  Prenatal exposure to stressful life events is associated with masculinized anogenital distance (AGD) in female infants.

Authors:  Emily S Barrett; Lauren E Parlett; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Fan Liu; J Bruce Redmon; Christina Wang; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2013-03-13

2.  Prenatal immune stimulation alters the postnatal acute phase and metabolic responses to an endotoxin challenge in weaned beef heifers.

Authors:  Jeffery A Carroll; Nicole C Burdick Sanchez; Paul R Broadway; Gleise M Silva; Juliana Ranches; Julie Warren; John D Arthington; Phillip A Lancaster; Philipe Moriel
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-07

3.  Size at birth, morning cortisol and cardiometabolic risk markers in healthy Indian children.

Authors:  G V Krishnaveni; S R Veena; A Dhube; S C Karat; D I W Phillips; C H D Fall
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.478

4.  The Effect of Different Feeding Systems on Salivary Cortisol Levels during Gestation in Sows on Herd Level.

Authors:  Ida Bahnsen; Kristina V Riddersholm; Leonardo V de Knegt; Thomas S Bruun; Charlotte Amdi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Effects of inadequate maternal dietary protein:carbohydrate ratios during pregnancy on offspring immunity in pigs.

Authors:  Margret Tuchscherer; Winfried Otten; Ellen Kanitz; Maria Gräbner; Armin Tuchscherer; Olaf Bellmann; Charlotte Rehfeldt; Cornelia C Metges
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Sex-specific prenatal stress effects on the rat reproductive axis and adrenal gland structure.

Authors:  Cheryl J Ashworth; Susan O George; Charis O Hogg; Yu-Ting Lai; Paula J Brunton
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.906

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.