Literature DB >> 18272200

Passive samplers versus surfactant extraction for the evaluation of PAH availability in sediments with variable levels of contamination.

Mickaël Barthe1, Emilien Pelletier, Gijs D Breedveld, Gerard Cornelissen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the efficiency of passive solid samplers, polyoxymethylene (POM) strips and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) silicon tubing, to predict the bioavailability of native PAHs in contaminated sediments. Results were compared with worm bioaccumulation data and solid/liquid extraction using the surfactant Brij((R)) 700 (B700). The two passive samplers were found to act differently. The PDMS sampler overestimated the availability of PAHs in all studied sediments. The POM method provided results in accordance with those obtained with the B700 extraction. However, POM and B700 methods underestimated PAH availability in low contaminated sediments where biological factors (digestible organic matter) become important. Bioavailability of total PAHs was correctly predicted by POM and B700 in highly contaminated aluminum smelter sediments. A closer examination of individual PAH results indicated that both techniques overestimated the availability of large molecules with logK(ow)>6 suggesting a biological mechanism limiting uptake of larger PAHs which seems to be related to the molecular size of compounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18272200     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  2 in total

Review 1.  Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: state of the science for organic contaminants.

Authors:  Michael J Lydy; Peter F Landrum; Amy Mp Oen; Mayumi Allinson; Foppe Smedes; Amanda D Harwood; Huizhen Li; Keith A Maruya; Jingfu Liu
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 2.  Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: scientific rationale supporting use of freely dissolved concentrations.

Authors:  Philipp Mayer; Thomas F Parkerton; Rachel G Adams; John G Cargill; Jay Gan; Todd Gouin; Philip M Gschwend; Steven B Hawthorne; Paul Helm; Gesine Witt; Jing You; Beate I Escher
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.992

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.