Literature DB >> 18272166

Multi-competitive interaction of As(III) and As(V) oxyanions with Ca(2+), Mg(2+), PO(3-)(4), and CO(2-)(3) ions on goethite.

Monika Stachowicz1, Tjisse Hiemstra, Willem H van Riemsdijk.   

Abstract

Complex systems, simulating natural conditions like in groundwater, have rarely been studied, since measuring and in particular, modeling of such systems is very challenging. In this paper, the adsorption of the oxyanions of As(III) and As(V) on goethite has been studied in presence of various inorganic macro-elements (Mg(2+), Ca(2+), PO(3-)(4), CO(2-)(3)). We have used 'single-,' 'dual-,' and 'triple-ion' systems. The presence of Ca(2+) and Mg(2+) has no significant effect on As(III) oxyanion (arsenite) adsorption in the pH range relevant for natural groundwater (pH 5-9). In contrast, both Ca(2+) and Mg(2+) promote the adsorption of PO(3-)(4). A similar (electrostatic) effect is expected for the Ca(2+) and Mg(2+) interaction with As(V) oxyanions (arsenate). Phosphate is a major competitor for arsenate as well as arsenite. Although carbonate may act as competitor for both types of As oxyanions, the presence of significant concentrations of phosphate makes the interaction of (bi)carbonate insignificant. The data have been modeled with the charge distribution (CD) model in combination with the extended Stern model option. In the modeling, independently calculated CD values were used for the oxyanions. The CD values for these complexes have been obtained from a bond valence interpretation of MO/DFT (molecular orbital/density functional theory) optimized geometries. The affinity constants (logK) have been found by calibrating the model on data from 'single-ion' systems. The parameters are used to predict the ion adsorption behavior in the multi-component systems. The thus calibrated model is able to predict successfully the ion concentrations in the mixed 2- and 3-component systems as a function of pH and loading. From a practical perspective, data as well as calculations show the dominance of phosphate in regulating the As concentrations. Arsenite (As(OH)(3)) is often less strongly bound than arsenate (AsO(3-)(4)) but arsenite responses less strongly to changes in the phosphate concentration compared to arsenate, i.e., deltalogc(As(III))/deltalogc(PO(4)) approximately 0.4 and deltalogc(As(V))/deltalogc(PO(4)) approximately 0.9 at pH 7. Therefore, the response of As in a sediment on a change in redox conditions will be variable and will depend on the phosphate concentration level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18272166     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci        ISSN: 0021-9797            Impact factor:   8.128


  15 in total

1.  Fluxes of nutrients and trace metals across the sediment-water interface controlled by sediment-capping agents: bentonite and sand.

Authors:  Junho Han; Hee-Myong Ro; Kyung Hwa Cho; Kyoung-Woong Kim
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Reducing arsenic and groundwater contaminants down to safe level for drinking purposes via Fe3+-attached hybrid column.

Authors:  Fatma Gurbuz; Şahin Akpınar; Samet Ozcan; Ömür Acet; Mehmet Odabaşı
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Soil calcium significantly promotes uptake of inorganic arsenic by garland chrysanthemum (ChrysanthemumL coronarium) fertilized with chicken manure bearing roxarsone and its metabolites.

Authors:  Lixian Yao; Lianxi Huang; Cuihua Bai; Zhaohuan He; Changmin Zhou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  A mechanistic model for understanding root-induced chemical changes controlling phosphorus availability.

Authors:  Nicolas Devau; Edith Le Cadre; Philippe Hinsinger; Frédéric Gérard
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Groundwater arsenic removal using granular TiO2: integrated laboratory and field study.

Authors:  Jinli Cui; Jingjing Du; Siwu Yu; Chuanyong Jing; Tingshan Chan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Removal of arsenic(III,V) by a granular Mn-oxide-doped Al oxide adsorbent: surface characterization and performance.

Authors:  Kun Wu; Jin Zhang; Bing Chang; Ting Liu; Furong Zhang; Pengkang Jin; Wendong Wang; Xiaochang Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  The effect of microbial sulfidogenesis on the stability of As-Fe coprecipitate with low Fe/As molar ratio under anaerobic conditions.

Authors:  Shaofeng Wang; Xin Yu He; Rongrong Pan; Liying Xu; Xin Wang; Yongfeng Jia
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Effects of NO3 (-) and PO4 (3-) on the release of geogenic arsenic and antimony in agricultural wetland soil: a field and laboratory approach.

Authors:  Asmaa Rouwane; Marion Rabiet; Malgorzata Grybos; Guillaume Bernard; Gilles Guibaud
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Adsorption and desorption of arsenic to aquifer sediment on the Red River floodplain at Nam Du, Vietnam.

Authors:  Nguyen Thi Hoa Mai; Dieke Postma; Pham Thi Kim Trang; Søren Jessen; Pham Hung Viet; Flemming Larsen
Journal:  Geochim Cosmochim Acta       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 5.010

10.  Genome-wide association study identifies chromosome 10q24.32 variants associated with arsenic metabolism and toxicity phenotypes in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Brandon L Pierce; Muhammad G Kibriya; Lin Tong; Farzana Jasmine; Maria Argos; Shantanu Roy; Rachelle Paul-Brutus; Ronald Rahaman; Muhammad Rakibuz-Zaman; Faruque Parvez; Alauddin Ahmed; Iftekhar Quasem; Samar K Hore; Shafiul Alam; Tariqul Islam; Vesna Slavkovich; Mary V Gamble; Md Yunus; Mahfuzar Rahman; John A Baron; Joseph H Graziano; Habibul Ahsan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.