BACKGROUND: The arterial base deficit has been demonstrated to be a marker of shock and predictive of survival in injured patients. The venous blood, however, may better reflect tissue perfusion. Its usefulness in trauma is unknown. We compared central venous with arterial blood gas analysis to determine which was a better predictor of survival in injured patients. METHODS: A prospective, nonrandomized series of acutely injured patients was investigated. Patients who had an arterial blood gas analysis for acid-base determination had a simultaneous central venous blood gas analysis and routine blood tests. Patient demographics, Injury Severity Score, and survival past 24 hours were recorded. Arterial and venous blood samples were analyzed for pH, PCO2, PO2, HCO3, hemoglobin-oxygen saturation, base deficit, and lactate. RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled. There were 76 survivors and 24 nonsurvivors. Wilcoxon rank sum test and multivariate logistic regression were used for each recorded variable; only central venous base deficit was predictive of survival past 24 hours (P = .0081). Specifically, arterial base deficit was not predictive of survival past 24 hours. CONCLUSION: In a prospective series of acutely injured patients, central venous base deficit, not arterial base deficit, was predictive of survival past 24 hours.
BACKGROUND: The arterial base deficit has been demonstrated to be a marker of shock and predictive of survival in injured patients. The venous blood, however, may better reflect tissue perfusion. Its usefulness in trauma is unknown. We compared central venous with arterial blood gas analysis to determine which was a better predictor of survival in injured patients. METHODS: A prospective, nonrandomized series of acutely injured patients was investigated. Patients who had an arterial blood gas analysis for acid-base determination had a simultaneous central venous blood gas analysis and routine blood tests. Patient demographics, Injury Severity Score, and survival past 24 hours were recorded. Arterial and venous blood samples were analyzed for pH, PCO2, PO2, HCO3, hemoglobin-oxygen saturation, base deficit, and lactate. RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled. There were 76 survivors and 24 nonsurvivors. Wilcoxon rank sum test and multivariate logistic regression were used for each recorded variable; only central venous base deficit was predictive of survival past 24 hours (P = .0081). Specifically, arterial base deficit was not predictive of survival past 24 hours. CONCLUSION: In a prospective series of acutely injured patients, central venous base deficit, not arterial base deficit, was predictive of survival past 24 hours.
Authors: Scott E Rudkin; Christopher A Kahn; Jennifer A Oman; Matthew O Dolich; Shahram Lotfipour; Stephanie Lush; Marla Gain; Charmaine Firme; Craig L Anderson; Mark I Langdorf Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2011-12-12 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Eli Zeserson; Ben Goodgame; J Daniel Hess; Kristine Schultz; Cynthia Hoon; Keith Lamb; Vinay Maheshwari; Steven Johnson; Mia Papas; James Reed; Michael Breyer Journal: J Intensive Care Med Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 3.510
Authors: Javier Urbano; Rafael González; Jorge López; María J Solana; José M Bellón; Marta Botrán; Ana García; Sarah N Fernández; Jesús López-Herce Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andres Isaza-Restrepo; Jose F Moreno-Mejia; Juan S Martin-Saavedra; Milciades Ibañez-Pinilla Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 5.469