| Literature DB >> 18271957 |
Marleen C D G Huigen1, Petronella M van Ham, Loek de Graaf, Ron M Kagan, Charles A B Boucher, Monique Nijhuis.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: HIV-1 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) have been used in the clinic for over twenty years. Interestingly, the complete resistance pattern to this class has not been fully elucidated. Novel mutations in RT appearing during treatment failure are still being identified. To unravel the role of two of these newly identified changes, E40F and K43E, we investigated their effect on viral drug susceptibility and replicative capacity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18271957 PMCID: PMC2276231 DOI: 10.1186/1742-4690-5-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Retrovirology ISSN: 1742-4690 Impact factor: 4.602
Amino acid variation at codons 40 and 43 in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase
| Codon 40 | Number | pct of mut | pct of total | Codon 43 | Number | pct of mut | pct of total |
| D | 732 | 38.0% | 0.452% | E | 4262 | 38.1% | 2.631% |
| F | 541 | 28.1% | 0.334% | Q | 2444 | 21.8% | 1.509% |
| E/D | 264 | 13.7% | 0.163% | N | 1516 | 13.5% | 0.936% |
| K | 54 | 2.8% | 0.033% | K/E | 836 | 7.5% | 0.516% |
| K/E | 53 | 2.8% | 0.033% | K/Q | 699 | 6.2% | 0.432% |
| A | 50 | 2.6% | 0.031% | R | 379 | 3.4% | 0.234% |
| E/Q | 33 | 1.7% | 0.020% | K/N | 333 | 3.0% | 0.206% |
| E/G | 27 | 1.4% | 0.017% | K/R | 285 | 2.5% | 0.176% |
| E/A | 27 | 1.4% | 0.017% | E/Q | 122 | 1.1% | 0.075% |
| Q | 21 | 1.1% | 0.013% | K/D/N/E | 41 | 0.4% | 0.025% |
| V | 21 | 1.1% | 0.013% | A | 37 | 0.3% | 0.023% |
| V/F | 10 | 0.5% | 0.006% | T | 36 | 0.3% | 0.022% |
| S/F | 10 | 0.5% | 0.006% | K/H/N/Q | 34 | 0.3% | 0.021% |
| <10 examples | 81 | 4.2% | 0.050% | M | 33 | 0.3% | 0.020% |
| K/T | 20 | 0.2% | 0.012% | ||||
| Total | 1924 | 100.0% | 1.188% | S | 19 | 0.2% | 0.012% |
| N/H | 14 | 0.1% | 0.009% | ||||
| K/A/T/E | 10 | 0.1% | 0.006% | ||||
| <10 examples | 69 | 0.6% | 0.043% | ||||
| Total | 11189 | 100.0% | 6.908% | ||||
In a total of 161974 sequences the amino acid variation at codons 40 and 43 in reverse transcriptase was determined. Shown are the percentages of the specified amino acid change of all mutations at that position (pct of mut) and in the total population (pct of total).
Association of 40F and 43E with thymidine analogue-associated mutations
| pos1 | pos2 | phi | OR | % pos2 in pos1 | P value |
| 40F | 43E | 0.287 | 38.2 | 84% | <10E-09 |
| 40F | 41L | 0.125 | 6.9 | 99% | <10E-09 |
| 40F | 210W | 0.162 | 11.2 | 97% | <10E-09 |
| 40F | 215Y | 0.124 | 7.2 | 94% | <10E-09 |
| 40F | 67N | 0.107 | 6.6 | 79% | <10E-09 |
| 40F | 70R | 0.001 | 1.1 | 9% | |
| 40F | 215F | -0.001 | 0.9 | 4% | |
| 40F | 219E | 0.032 | 4.6 | 14% | <10E-09 |
| 40F | 219Q | -0.003 | 0.8 | 4% | |
| 43E | 40F | 0.287 | 38.2 | 10% | <10E-09 |
| 43E | 41L | 0.326 | 6.3 | 91% | <10E-09 |
| 43E | 210W | 0.367 | 9.0 | 78% | <10E-09 |
| 43E | 215Y | 0.31 | 6.4 | 82% | <10E-09 |
| 43E | 67N | 0.211 | 4.8 | 58% | <10E-09 |
| 43E | 70R | -0.002 | 0.9 | 9% | |
| 43E | 215F | 0.014 | 1.4 | 7% | 9.7E-08 |
| 43E | 219E | 0.009 | 1.4 | 4% | |
| 43E | 219Q | 0.004 | 1.1 | 6% | |
Binomial correlation coefficients (phi) and Odds Ratios (OR) were calculated for 57 amino acid substitutions at 34 reverse transcriptase codons to study the association of E40F and K43E with each other and with known thymidine analogue associated mutations.
Phi: binomial correlation coefficient (1.0 = perfect pairwise correlation). OR: Odds Ratio – the observed frequency of the pair divided by the product of the individual mutation frequencies. P-value: chisquare probability was evaluated for significance at a Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.01 for 1,566 multiple comparisons.
NS: Not significant at FDR 0.01.
Sequences with a phi value of 0.15 or greater, an odds ratio of > 2 and FDR of 0.01 were considered to be co-varying.
Zidovudine susceptibility analysis
| Resistance-associated amino acid in RT | 40 | 41 | 43 | 184 | 210 | 215 | 219 | Average | Fold | ||
| Consensus B | E | M | K | M | L | T | K | IC50 (nM) | Increase | ||
| Wild type (HXB2) | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 114 | ± | 10 | |
| Wild type+K43E | . | . | E | . | . | . | . | 90 | ± | 36 | 1× |
| M41L+T215Y | . | L | . | . | . | Y | . | 1544 | ± | 402 | 14× |
| M41L+T215Y+E40F | F | L | . | . | . | Y | . | 21307 | ± | 8810 | 187× |
| M41L+T215Y+K43E | . | L | E | . | . | Y | . | 1556 | ± | 496 | 14× |
| M41L+T215Y+E40F+K43E | F | L | E | . | . | Y | . | 15350 | ± | 5022 | 135× |
| Pat A | F | L | E | V | W | Y | T | 14739 | ± | 3105 | 129× |
| Pat A-WT40 | . | L | E | V | W | Y | T | 1596 | ± | 377 | 14× |
| Pat A-WT43 | F | L | . | V | W | Y | T | 13127 | ± | 4582 | 115× |
Pat A-derived virus clone revealed additional amino acid changes including T200I, R211K, V245T, E248D, I293V and E297H
The mean IC50 values of at least two experiments are shown (± standard error of the mean); in the most right column the fold increase compared to the wild type HIV-1 HXB2 reference strain is shown.
Figure 1Replication competition experiments with E40F site-directed mutants. Replication competition experiments were performed in SupT1 cells in at least two independent experiments. After four days and after 2, 4 and 6 passages the relative presence of both viruses in the culture was determined by sequencing. Shown are two representative experiments. The variability in each independent experiment is indicated by ± standard error of the mean (SEM). A: M41L+T215Y versus M41L+T215Y+E40F B: Pat A (E40F, M41L, K43E, M184V, L210W, T215Y and K219T) versus Pat A-WT40 (M41L, K43E, M184V, L210W, T215Y and K219T).
Figure 2Replication competition experiments with K43E site-directed mutants. Replication competition experiments were performed in SupT1 cells in at least two independent experiments. After four days and after 2, 4 and 6 passages the relative presence of both viruses in the culture was determined by sequencing. Shown are two representative experiments. The variability in each independent experiment is indicated by ± standard error of the mean (SEM). A: Pat A (E40F, M41L, K43E, M184V, L210W, T215Y and K219T) versus Pat A-WT43 (E40F, M41L, M184V, L210W, T215Y and K219T). B: wild type versus wild type+K43E. C: M41L+T215Y versus M41L+T215Y+K43E. D: M41L+T215Y+E40F versus M41L+T215Y+E40F+K43E.
In vitro evolution experiments
| 40 | 41 | 43 | 122 | 184 | 200 | 210 | 211 | 214 | 215 | 219 | 245 | 248 | 272 | 277 | 293 | 297 | ||
| HXB2 | E | M | K | E | M | T | L | R | L | T | K | V | E | P | R | I | E | |
| experiment A | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment B | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment C | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment D | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment A | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment B | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment C | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment D | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | ||
| experiment A | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment B | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment C | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment D | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment A | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment B | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment C | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment D | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment A | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | T/I | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment B | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment C | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment D | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment A | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment B | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment C | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment D | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment A | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment B | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment C | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment D | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment A | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment B | F/L | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment C | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| experiment D | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Shown are all amino acid changes present at start of the experiment compared to wild type (HXB2) and after 10 passages compared to baseline. All evolution experiments were performed in four independent experiments (A-D).