Literature DB >> 18271839

The influence of blood volume-controlled ultrafiltration on hemodynamic stability and quality of life.

Bas Sentveld1, Mandy van den Brink, Harald F H Brulez, Bert-Jan Potter van Loon, Marcel C Weijmer, Carl E H Siegert.   

Abstract

Dialysis hypotension occurs frequently and is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and may influence quality of life. We investigated the influence of blood volume (BV)-controlled ultrafiltration on hemodynamic stability and quality of life in a prospective multiple crossover study. Nineteen patients were consecutively treated with standard hemodialysis (HD), BV-controlled ultrafiltration, and again with standard ultrafiltration during 3-week phases, during which different hemodynamic parameters, ultrafiltrate quantities, dry weight, and quality of life were measured. Blood volume-controlled ultrafiltration resulted in increased hemodynamic stability: systolic blood pressure was significantly higher after treatment with BV-controlled HD compared with both standard treatments (p=0.018 and 0.043, respectively). Also, systolic blood pressure reduction, as a measure of blood pressure stability, was significantly smaller during the BV-controlled phase (-3.9 mmHg) compared with both standard phases (-13.7 and -11.0 mmHg): p=0.003 and 0.035, respectively. No difference was found in the occurrence of large decreases of blood pressure (>30 mmHg), decreases below 90 mmHg systolic pressure, or subjective complaints during treatment or after treatment between both treatment modalities. During the course of the study, the dry weight decreased significantly from mean 73.3 to mean 70.9 kg, and the amount of ultrafiltrate was significantly larger using BV-controlled HD compared with standard treatment (mean 2407 vs. mean 2266 mL; p=0.035). Quality of life, measured by visual analog scales (VAS), showed discrete but no consistent differences between study phases. We conclude that BV-controlled HD increases hemodynamic stability and ultrafiltrate amount compared with a standard treatment. No consistent change in quality of life is found between both treatment modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18271839     DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2008.00238.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hemodial Int        ISSN: 1492-7535            Impact factor:   1.812


  3 in total

Review 1.  Cooling dialysate during in-center hemodialysis: Beneficial and deleterious effects.

Authors:  Stephanie M Toth-Manikowski; Stephen M Sozio
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-06

2.  Comparison of multiple fluid status assessment methods in patients on chronic hemodialysis.

Authors:  Giannis Alexiadis; Stelios Panagoutsos; Stefanos Roumeliotis; Ilias Stibiris; Angelos Markos; Konstantia Kantartzi; Ploumis Passadakis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Cold dialysis and its impact on renal patients' health: An evidence-based mini review.

Authors:  Giorgos K Sakkas; Argiro A Krase; Christoforos D Giannaki; Christina Karatzaferi
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.