Literature DB >> 18270847

Regulatory issues for genetic testing in clinical practice.

Ulf Kristoffersson1.   

Abstract

Whereas deliver of health care is nationally based with great differences in ways of service provision and financing between countries, and thus not subject to international regulations, genetic testing has become more exposed to international regulations and conventions. This is due to an interest of protecting the individual for abuse by inappropriate use of genetic information, but also to the fact that a specimen from a person aimed for a medical (clinical genetic) test is considered as "tradable goods", and thus also subject to other non-medical associated regulations. There is a substantial transborder flow of samples for genetic testing thus requiring internationally accepted quality standards. Therefore, laboratories acting on an international market need to follow certain rules and regulations, also applicable to obtain high-quality standards nationally. Further, genetic testing for rare disorders is often provided by a limited number of non-commercial laboratories and associated with research programs for the individual disorders. International surveys have revealed that there is a general lack of high standards for quality assurance. This article is aimed to give an introduction and overview of regulations, conventions, and quality standards applicable for the laboratory who is seeking to improve there quality performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18270847     DOI: 10.1007/s12033-008-9041-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1073-6085            Impact factor:   2.695


  6 in total

1.  The challenge of validating genetic testing.

Authors:  U Kristoffersson
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2000

2.  Genetic testing: policy issues for the new millennium.

Authors:  E Ronchi; D Harper; A Taylor; A G Halsberger
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2000

3.  Cytogenetic Guidelines and Quality Assurance: a common European framework for quality assessment for constitutional and acquired cytogenetic investigations.

Authors:  Ros J Hastings; Simona Cavani; Franca Dagna Bricarelli; Philippos C Patsalis; Ulf Kristoffersson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Report of an international survey of molecular genetic testing laboratories.

Authors:  Margaret M McGovern; Rob Elles; Isabella Beretta; Martin J Somerville; Gerald Hoefler; Mauri Keinanen; David Barton; Nancy Carson; Elisabeth Dequeker; Radim Brdicka; Alena Blazkova; Ségolène Aymé; Birgit Schnieders; Clemens R Muller; Vibeke Dalen; Armando Albert Martinez; Ulf Kristoffersson; Meral Ozguc; Hansjakob Mueller; Joe Boone; Ira M Lubin; Jorge Sequeiros; Domenica Taruscio; Bob Williamson; Lynn Mainland; Hiroshi Yoshikura; Elettra Ronchi
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2007

5.  The use and interpretation of commercial APC gene testing for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  F M Giardiello; J D Brensinger; G M Petersen; M C Luce; L M Hylind; J A Bacon; S V Booker; R D Parker; S R Hamilton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-03-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 November 1996). Council of Europe Convention of Biomedicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.918

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.