BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a high-resolution solid-state catheter system could detect regional pressure changes within the antrum and pylorus in response to CCK-octapeptide. METHODS: Subjects received a 30 min infusion of CCK-octapeptide at either 0.02 or 0.06 microg kg(-1) h(-1). RESULTS: Five males and two females were studied. Mean antral pressure during phase I MMC increased from 5.3 +/- 2.1 to 9.9 +/- 2.4 mmHg (P = 0.028) after infusion. At the pylorus, only the 0.06 microg kg(-1) h(-1) dose increased tonic pressure (8.8 +/- 1.4 to 17.6 +/- 2.0 mmHg; P = 0.01) as compared with the 0.02 microg kg(-1) h(-1) dose (4.7 +/- 0.7 to 7.3 +/- 0.4 mmHg; P = NS). The peak pressure of pyloric phasic pressure waves was 153 +/- 28.4 mmHg and their frequency was 4.9 +/- 1.1 contractions min(-1). CONCLUSIONS: CCK-octapeptide elicits both tonic and phasic activity of the pyloric sphincter. The contractile response to a dose of 0.06 mug kg(-1) h(-1) is greater than the response to 0.02 mug kg(-1) h(-1).
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a high-resolution solid-state catheter system could detect regional pressure changes within the antrum and pylorus in response to CCK-octapeptide. METHODS: Subjects received a 30 min infusion of CCK-octapeptide at either 0.02 or 0.06 microg kg(-1) h(-1). RESULTS: Five males and two females were studied. Mean antral pressure during phase I MMC increased from 5.3 +/- 2.1 to 9.9 +/- 2.4 mmHg (P = 0.028) after infusion. At the pylorus, only the 0.06 microg kg(-1) h(-1) dose increased tonic pressure (8.8 +/- 1.4 to 17.6 +/- 2.0 mmHg; P = 0.01) as compared with the 0.02 microg kg(-1) h(-1) dose (4.7 +/- 0.7 to 7.3 +/- 0.4 mmHg; P = NS). The peak pressure of pyloric phasic pressure waves was 153 +/- 28.4 mmHg and their frequency was 4.9 +/- 1.1 contractions min(-1). CONCLUSIONS:CCK-octapeptide elicits both tonic and phasic activity of the pyloric sphincter. The contractile response to a dose of 0.06 mug kg(-1) h(-1) is greater than the response to 0.02 mug kg(-1) h(-1).
Authors: J Desipio; F K Friedenberg; A Korimilli; J E Richter; H P Parkman; R S Fisher Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: M Fried; U Erlacher; W Schwizer; C Löchner; J Koerfer; C Beglinger; J B Jansen; C B Lamers; F Harder; A Bischof-Delaloye Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1991-08 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: B M Meyer; B A Werth; C Beglinger; P Hildebrand; J B Jansen; D Zach; L C Rovati; G A Stalder Journal: Lancet Date: 1989-07-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: W Schwizer; J Borovicka; P Kunz; R Fraser; C Kreiss; M D'Amato; G Crelier; P Boesiger; M Fried Journal: Gut Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Terry L Powley; Cherie N Hudson; Jennifer L McAdams; Elizabeth A Baronowsky; Felecia N Martin; Jacqueline K Mason; Robert J Phillips Journal: Auton Neurosci Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 3.145