Literature DB >> 18270746

Summer kill rates and predation pattern in a wolf-moose system: can we rely on winter estimates?

Håkan Sand1, Petter Wabakken, Barbara Zimmermann, Orjan Johansson, Hans C Pedersen, Olof Liberg.   

Abstract

So far the vast majority of studies on large carnivore predation, including kill rates and consumption, have been based on winter studies. Because large carnivores relying on ungulates as prey often show a preference for juveniles, kill rates may be both higher and more variable during the summer season than during the rest of the year leading to serious underestimates of the total annual predation rate. This study is the first to present detailed empirical data on kill rates and prey selection in a wolf-moose system during summer (June-September) as obtained by applying modern Global Positioning System-collar techniques on individual wolves (Canis lupus) in Scandinavia. Moose (Alces alces) was the dominant prey species both by number (74.4%) and biomass (95.6%); 89.9% of all moose killed were juveniles, representing 76.0% of the biomass consumed by wolves. Kill rate in terms of the kilogram biomass/kilogram wolf per day averaged 0.20 (range: 0.07-0.32) among wolf territories and was above, or well above, the daily minimum food requirements in most territories. The average number of days between moose kills across wolf territories and study periods was 1.71 days, but increased with time and size of growing moose calves during summer. Over the entire summer (June-September, 122 days), a group (from two to nine) of wolves killed a total of 66 (confidence interval 95%; 56-81) moose. Incorporation of body growth functions of moose calves and yearlings and wolf pups over the summer period showed that wolves adjusted their kill rate on moose, so the amount of biomass/kilogram wolf was relatively constant or increased. The kill rate was much higher (94-116%) than estimated from the winter period. As a consequence, projecting winter kill rates to obtain annual estimates of predation in similar predator-prey systems may result in a significant underestimation of the total number of prey killed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18270746     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-0969-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  3 in total

1.  Wolf pack size and food acquisition.

Authors:  P A Schmidt; L D Mech
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Moose-wolf dynamics and the natural regulation of moose populations.

Authors:  François Messier; Michel Crête
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Cross-continental differences in patterns of predation: will naive moose in Scandinavia ever learn?

Authors:  Håkan Sand; Camilla Wikenros; Petter Wabakken; Olof Liberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

  3 in total
  27 in total

Review 1.  Building a mechanistic understanding of predation with GPS-based movement data.

Authors:  Evelyn Merrill; Håkan Sand; Barbara Zimmermann; Heather McPhee; Nathan Webb; Mark Hebblewhite; Petter Wabakken; Jacqueline L Frair
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Separating spatial search and efficiency rates as components of predation risk.

Authors:  Nicholas J DeCesare
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Home range size variation in a recovering wolf population: evaluating the effect of environmental, demographic, and social factors.

Authors:  Jenny Mattisson; Håkan Sand; Petter Wabakken; Vincenzo Gervasi; Olof Liberg; John D C Linnell; Geir Rune Rauset; Hans Christian Pedersen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Specialization for aggression in sexually dimorphic skeletal morphology in grey wolves (Canis lupus).

Authors:  Jeremy S Morris; Ellissa K Brandt
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Gastrointestinal helminths of gray wolves (Canis lupus lupus) from Sweden.

Authors:  Mohammad Nafi Solaiman Al-Sabi; Linnea Rääf; Eva Osterman-Lind; Henrik Uhlhorn; Christian Moliin Outzen Kapel
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Testing the risk of predation hypothesis: the influence of recolonizing wolves on habitat use by moose.

Authors:  Kerry L Nicholson; Cyril Milleret; Johan Månsson; Håkan Sand
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Summer movements, predation and habitat use of wolves in human modified boreal forests.

Authors:  Eliezer Gurarie; Johanna Suutarinen; Ilpo Kojola; Otso Ovaskainen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Predicting the potential demographic impact of predators on their prey: a comparative analysis of two carnivore-ungulate systems in Scandinavia.

Authors:  Vincenzo Gervasi; Erlend B Nilsen; Håkan Sand; Manuela Panzacchi; Geir R Rauset; Hans C Pedersen; Jonas Kindberg; Petter Wabakken; Barbara Zimmermann; John Odden; Olof Liberg; Jon E Swenson; John D C Linnell
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  Effect of sociality and season on gray wolf (Canis lupus) foraging behavior: implications for estimating summer kill rate.

Authors:  Matthew C Metz; John A Vucetich; Douglas W Smith; Daniel R Stahler; Rolf O Peterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Consequences of a refuge for the predator-prey dynamics of a wolf-elk system in Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Joshua F Goldberg; Mark Hebblewhite; John Bardsley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.