Literature DB >> 18270721

Fixation of ankle fragility fractures by tibiotalocalcaneal nail.

Rouin Amirfeyz1, Andrew Bacon, Jeff Ling, Ashley Blom, Steve Hepple, Ian Winson, William Harries.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fragility fractures of the ankle are difficult to treat by conventional fixation due to poor bone quality, compromised soft tissues, and inherent instability. Conservative management of these patients also has its problems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 13 patients who underwent intramedullary nailing through the tibiotalocalcaneal joints in an attempt to achieve the dual aims of fracture control and early mobilisation. The Olerud and Molander scale was used as outcome measures.
RESULTS: There were 12 females and 1 male with a mean age of 78.9 (range 64-93). Half of the patients were discharged from hospital within the first 2 weeks after the operation. All achieved a comparable function to their pre-operative state. The mean follow-up period was 11 months (range of 2-62 months). Six are now deceased from unrelated causes. The mean Olerud and Molander score was 50 (range 30-65). All the radiographs showed evidence of fracture union with no changes in the overall alignment of the joint.
CONCLUSION: Given the low survivorship of this frail group of patients the main objectives are achieving early mobilisation whilst maintaining good fracture position. In our experience, tibiotalocalcaneal nailing is a very useful and successful way of treating fragility fractures of the ankle because it has a low risk of complications and restores function with impressive patient satisfaction. The potential benefits of this technique, we believe, outweigh the disability ensued from subtalar joint fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18270721     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-008-0584-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  6 in total

1.  Male sex, Gustillo-Anderson type III open fracture and definitive external fixation are risk factors for a return to the or following the surgical management of geriatric low energy open ankle fractures.

Authors:  Mitchell S Fourman; Joshua Adjei; Richard Wawrose; Gele Moloney; Peter A Siska; Ivan S Tarkin
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  High-risk ankle fractures in high-risk older patients: to fix or nail?

Authors:  Thomas M Large; Adam M Kaufman; Harold M Frisch; Kaitlyn R Bankieris
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  Primary Retrograde Tibiotalocalcaneal Nailing For Fragility Ankle Fractures.

Authors:  Benjamin C Taylor; Dane C Hansen; Ryan Harrison; Douglas E Lucas; Daniel Degenova
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2016

Review 4.  [Intraarticular fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint: dynamic early functional therapy with an external fixation system].

Authors:  E Goldberg; F Unglaub; U Kneser; R E Horch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  Tibiotalocalcaneal nailing for osteoporotic ankle fractures in the frail patient: a narrative review with a clinical score proposal for the decision-making process.

Authors:  Mario Herrera-Pérez; Pablo Martín-Vélez; David González-Martín; Miguel Domínguez-Meléndez; Ahmed E Galhoum; Victor Valderrabano; Sergio Tejero
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-05-05

6.  Tibiotalocalcaneal Intramedullary Nailing for Unstable Geriatric Ankle Fractures.

Authors:  Elif Kulakli-Inceleme; David B Tas; Diederik P J Smeeing; Roderick M Houwert; Nicole M van Veelen; Bjoern-Christian Link; Lukas D Iselin; Matthias Knobe; Reto Babst; Frank J P Beeres
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.