Literature DB >> 18270692

On the mechanism of uranium binding to cell wall of Chara fragilis.

Marko Daković1, Maja Kovacević, Pavle R Andjus, Goran Bacić.   

Abstract

Biosorption of uranium from nuclear waste liquids and contaminated surface waters and soils has recently attracted special interest. However, the detailed mechanism of uranium uptake by plants is not well understood. The aim of this work is to investigate the role of cell wall components of the freshwater alga Chara fragilis in uranium sequestration from its solution. Three types of algae preparations: extract of cell wall polysaccharides, dried and live algae were subjected to uranium solutions of different concentration and pH. FTIR and X-ray diffraction were used to assess both potential binding sites and the form of the uranyl sequestered by algae. Sorption of uranium by live and dry algae shows remarkable differences both in terms of overall uptake and mechanisms involved. All experiments are consistent with the conclusion that coprecipitation of uranyl species with CaCO3 is the major binding mechanism in uranium sequestration by Chara fragilis, while the direct exchange of Ca2+ with UO22+ has a minor role. Live algae are twice as efficient in sequestering uranium from solution than dried ones due to the formation of different crystalline forms such as aragonite and rutherfordine forming in live algae in the presence of the uranyl species in solution. It therefore appears that metabolic processes such as photosynthesis, most likely through the regulation of pH, play a key role in the uranium uptake by plants. Further understanding of the complex mechanism of metabolic control of the uranium uptake by plants is needed before the planning of bioremediation of this element.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18270692     DOI: 10.1007/s00249-008-0282-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Biophys J        ISSN: 0175-7571            Impact factor:   1.733


  10 in total

Review 1.  Biosorption: a solution to pollution?

Authors:  R H Vieira; B Volesky
Journal:  Int Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 2.  A review of the biochemistry of heavy metal biosorption by brown algae.

Authors:  Thomas A Davis; Bohumil Volesky; Alfonso Mucci
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 11.236

3.  Modeling of the proton-metal ion exchange in biosorption.

Authors:  S Schiewer; B Volesky
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Through pore diameter in the cell wall of Chara corallina.

Authors:  G N Berestovsky; V I Ternovsky; A A Kataev
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  Spectrophotometric determination of uranium with arsenazo-III in perchloric acid.

Authors:  Muhammad Haleem Khan; Peter Warwick; Nick Evans
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Relations between algal populations and the pH of their media.

Authors:  Z Dubinsky; J Rotem
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  The removal of uranium from mining waste water using algal/microbial biomass.

Authors:  Margarete Kalin; W N Wheeler; G Meinrath
Journal:  J Environ Radioact       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.674

8.  Primary cell wall composition of bryophytes and charophytes.

Authors:  Zoë A Popper; Stephen C Fry
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Metal selectivity of Sargassum spp. and their alginates in relation to their alpha-L-guluronic acid content and conformation.

Authors:  Thomas A Davis; Francisco Llanes; Bohumil Volesky; Alfonso Mucci
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Quantitative analysis of synthetic calcium carbonate polymorphs using FT-IR spectroscopy.

Authors:  N V Vagenas; A Gatsouli; C G Kontoyannis
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2003-03-10       Impact factor: 6.057

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Biogeochemical behaviour and bioremediation of uranium in waters of abandoned mines.

Authors:  Martin Mkandawire
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Target or barrier? The cell wall of early- and later-diverging plants vs cadmium toxicity: differences in the response mechanisms.

Authors:  Luigi Parrotta; Gea Guerriero; Kjell Sergeant; Giampiero Cai; Jean-Francois Hausman
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.753

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.