Literature DB >> 18270376

Isotropic high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced 3.0-T MR angiography in patients suspected of having renal artery stenosis.

Ulrich Kramer1, Jakub Wiskirchen, Michael C Fenchel, Achim Seeger, Gerhard Laub, Gunnar Tepe, J Paul Finn, Claus D Claussen, Stephan Miller.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography performed at 3 T for assessment of renal artery stenosis (RAS) by using parallel acquisition techniques with high acceleration factors and with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard. The study was institutional review board approved, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Twenty-nine patients (18 men, 11 women; mean age, 57.1 years +/- 14.3 [standard deviation]) suspected of having RAS underwent MR angiography. Images were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. The interobserver variability, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 3-T MR angiography, as compared with DSA (performed in 15 patients), were calculated. All examinations yielded good or excellent image quality. The sensitivity and specificity of MR angiography in grading significant (>75%) stenosis were 94% and 96%, respectively. Owing to its high sensitivity, contrast-enhanced 3-T MR angiography can be used reliably to exclude RAS and can serve as a useful screening method in the diagnostic work-up of patients with arterial hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18270376     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2471070565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

1.  Automated quantification of carotid artery stenosis on contrast-enhanced MRA data using a deformable vascular tube model.

Authors:  Avan Suinesiaputra; Patrick J H de Koning; Elena Zudilova-Seinstra; Johan H C Reiber; Rob J van der Geest
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Is there a role for free breathing non-contrast steady-state free precession renal MRA imaging for assessing live donors? A preliminary study.

Authors:  I Laurence; B Ariff; R A Quest; S Moser; A Glover; D Taube; P Gishen; V Papalois; C Juli
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Assessment of the kidneys: magnetic resonance angiography, perfusion and diffusion.

Authors:  Ulrike I Attenberger; John N Morelli; Stefan O Schoenberg; Henrik J Michaely
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the abdomen with highly accelerated acquisition techniques.

Authors:  Petrice M Mostardi; James F Glockner; Phillip M Young; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance angiography: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Michael P Hartung; Thomas M Grist; Christopher J François
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  3D FIESTA pulse sequence for assessing renal artery stenosis: is it a reliable application in unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography?

Authors:  Caterina Gaudiano; Fiorenza Busato; Emiliana Ferramosca; Carlo Cecchelli; Beniamino Corcioni; Lucia Barbara De Sanctis; Antonio Santoro; Rita Golfieri
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 5.315

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.