Literature DB >> 18270295

Trends in compressed breast thickness and radiation dose in breast screening mammography.

M Robinson1, C J Kotre.   

Abstract

An analysis was performed of the compressed breast thickness recorded in 146 mammographic patient dose surveys each consisting of 50 or more women carried out between 1993 and 2004. The results show a steady and statistically significant increase in compressed breast thickness with time, which is also present when individual independent screening centres and equipment manufacturers are compared. This increase seems most likely to be associated with an increase in the proportion of women in the breast screening age range classified as overweight and obese, which has occurred over the same time period. The associated trends in mean glandular dose per image were calculated for the mammography units used at the time of the surveys, using the most recently published conversion factors. The increase in average radiation dose that might have been expected as a result of the increase in average compressed breast thickness was not actually found in practice, possibly because of advances in equipment design and dose optimization strategies made during the 11-year period. Other implications of an increasing average compressed breast thickness are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18270295     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/90916004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  6 in total

1.  Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by adiposity: an analysis of four case-control studies.

Authors:  Shannon M Conroy; Christy G Woolcott; Karin R Koga; Celia Byrne; Chisato Nagata; Giske Ursin; Celine M Vachon; Martin J Yaffe; Ian Pagano; Gertraud Maskarinec
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Clinical dose performance of full field digital mammography in a breast screening programme.

Authors:  J B McCullagh; P Baldelli; N Phelan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Jane Lange; Jeroen J van den Broek; Christoph I Lee; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Dominique Ritley; Karla Kerlikowske; Joshua J Fenton; Joy Melnikow; Harry J de Koning; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  European trends in radiology: investigating factors affecting the number of examinations and the effective dose.

Authors:  Hamidreza Masjedi; Mohammad Hosein Zare; Neda Keshavarz Siahpoush; Seid Kazem Razavi-Ratki; Fatemeh Alavi; Masoud Shabani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Near-infrared spectral tomography integrated with digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of tissue scattering on optical data acquisition design.

Authors:  Kelly Michaelsen; Venkat Krishnaswamy; Brian W Pogue; Steven P Poplack; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Characterization of materials for optimal near-infrared and x-ray imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Kelly Michaelsen; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Brian W Pogue; Ken Brooks; Ken Defreitas; Ian Shaw; Steven P Poplack; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.732

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.