Literature DB >> 18270271

Should endovascular repair be used for small abdominal aortic aneurysms?

Christopher J LeCroy1, Marc A Passman, Steven M Taylor, Mark A Patterson, Bart R Combs, William D Jordan.   

Abstract

The outcomes of endovascular repair for small abdominal aortic aneurysm (4.0-4.9 cm) is reported. All patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair between 2000 and 2006 with maximal diameter 4.0 to 4.9 cm form the small aneurysm study cohort. Data were analyzed retrospectively and life-table methods were used. Of 743 endovascular repairs, 132 (17.8%) were performed for small abdominal aortic aneurysm. Perioperative complication rate was 9.1%. Freedom from aneurysm expansion was 96% at 1 year, 86% at 3 years, and 77% at 5 years. Overall survival was 98%, 93%, and 84% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Perioperative 30-day mortality was 0.8% with an aneurysm-related mortality of 1.5% at 5 years. There were no deaths from delayed aneurysm rupture. Endovascular repair of small abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with low perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with published results for open repair, and treatment threshold can be reduced to 4 cm in selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18270271     DOI: 10.1177/1538574407312656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg        ISSN: 1538-5744            Impact factor:   1.089


  1 in total

1.  Should malaria treatment be guided by a point of care rapid test? A threshold approach to malaria management in rural Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Zeno Bisoffi; Halidou Tinto; Bienvenu Sodiomon Sirima; Federico Gobbi; Andrea Angheben; Dora Buonfrate; Jef Van den Ende
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.