Literature DB >> 18269636

Biphasic insulin aspart 30 treatment improves glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes in a clinical practice setting: experience from the PRESENT study.

D Khutsoane1, S K Sharma, M Almustafa, H C Jang, S T Azar, R Danciulescu, M Shestakova, N M A Ayad, S Guler, O M Bech.   

Abstract

AIM: The Physicians' Routine Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of NovoMix 30 Therapy (PRESENT) study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in routine clinical practice.
METHODS: This was a 6-month, prospective, multinational, multiethnic observational study involving 21 977 patients from 13 countries (India, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates). The patients were transferred to BIAsp 30 with or without oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) from prior treatment with OAD (n = 8583), insulin (n = 5942), OAD + insulin (n = 4673) or diet (i.e. treatment naive) (n = 1707). One thousand and seventy-two patients had incomplete or no information on previous treatment.
RESULTS: At 3 and 6 months, significant reductions from baseline were observed in the mean haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) (-1.33 and -1.81%), fasting plasma glucose (-3.02 and -3.74 mmol/l) and postprandial plasma glucose (-4.76 and -5.82 mmol/l) (p < 0.001). A significantly greater proportion of patients achieved target HbA(1c) of less than 7% at 3 months (15.3%) and 6 months (27.7%) compared with baseline (4.8%) (p < 0.001). Overall, the mean HbA(1c) at 6 months was lowered in patients regardless of prior treatment: -2.15% (OAD), -1.45% (insulin), -1.47% (OAD + insulin) and -2.35% (treatment naive). In the overall cohort, the rate of total hypoglycaemia was reduced from 5.4 events per patient-year at baseline to 2.2 events per patient-year at study end (p < 0.001). Among prior treatment subgroups, the rates of total hypoglycaemia were reduced from 2.5 to 2.1 events per patient-year in the OAD group, from 9.6 to 2.2 events per patient-year in the insulin group and from 7.6 to 2.5 events per patient-year in the OAD + insulin group but were increased from 1.0 to 1.8 events per patient-year in the treatment-naive group (p < 0.001). There were 444 adverse drug reactions (ADRs), including 13 serious ADRs: lipodystrophy (three events), symptoms of generalized hypersensitivity (two events), acute painful neuropathy (one event), worsening of diabetic retinopathy (one event), oedema (one event) and unspecified ADRs (five events).
CONCLUSION: The use of BIAsp 30 monotherapy or in combination with OADs in clinical practice was effective and safe in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18269636     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2007.00826.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab        ISSN: 1462-8902            Impact factor:   6.577


  10 in total

1.  Initiating or switching to biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 therapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. An observational study.

Authors:  Leif Breum; Thomas Almdal; Pia Eiken; Per Lund; Erik Christiansen
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2008-11-10

2.  Comparison of a soluble co-formulation of insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 in type 2 diabetes: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Leo Niskanen; Lawrence A Leiter; Edward Franek; Jianping Weng; Taner Damci; Manuel Muñoz-Torres; Jean-Paul Donnet; Lars Endahl; Trine Vang Skjøth; Allan Vaag
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 6.664

Review 3.  Ten years of experience with biphasic insulin aspart 30: from drug development to the latest clinical findings.

Authors:  Andreas Liebl; Vinay Prusty; Paul Valensi; Ryuzo Kawamori; Jens Sandahl Christiansen; Andrew J Palmer; Per Balschmidt; Robert Ligthelm; Viswanathan Mohan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30) in the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Paul Valensi
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 3.168

5.  Switching from basal or basal-bolus insulin to biphasic insulin aspart 30: Results from the Indian cohort of the A1 chieve study.

Authors:  Arpandev Bhattacharyya; Raman Shetty; C Rajkumar; Ganapathi Bantwal
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-07

Review 6.  Drug-related risk of severe hypoglycaemia in observational studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marcin Czech; Elżbieta Rdzanek; Justyna Pawęska; Olga Adamowicz-Sidor; Maciej Niewada; Michał Jakubczyk
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.763

7.  Improved Glycaemic Control with Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Failing Oral Antidiabetic Drugs: PRESENT Study Results.

Authors:  Serdar Güler; Surendra Kumar Sharma; Majeed Almustafa; Chong Hwa Kim; Sami Azar; Rucsandra Danciulescu; Marina Shestakova; Duma Khutsoane; Ole Molskov Bech
Journal:  Arch Drug Inf       Date:  2009-06

8.  An observational study of acarbose treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes from the Middle East and Morocco.

Authors:  Abdul R Shihabi; Essam M Moussa; Hania Sobierajska; Birgit Schmidt
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.168

9.  When glycaemic targets can no longer be achieved with basal insulin in type 2 diabetes, can simple intensification with a modern premixed insulin help? Results from a subanalysis of the PRESENT study.

Authors:  H C Jang; S Guler; M Shestakova
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  National Variations in Comorbidities, Glycosylated Hemoglobin Reduction, and Insulin Dosage in Asian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The FINE-Asia Registry.

Authors:  Linong Ji; Shih-Tzer Tsai; Jay Lin; Sanjiv Bhambani
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.945

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.