Literature DB >> 18269562

Cardiac function stratification based on echocardiographic or clinical markers of left ventricular filling pressures predicts death and hospitalization better than stratification by ventricular systolic function alone.

Kofo O Ogunyankin1, Andrew G Day, Eva Lonn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) often underestimates the poor prognosis associated with diastolic dysfunction.
METHODS: We compared overall and hospital-free survival according to echocardiographic diastolic function classification (echo class), clinical probability of diastolic dysfunction (clinical class) and LV grades based on biplane LVEF, in 114 subjects followed-up over a median of 47 months. Diastolic function was classified into normal, impaired relaxation, and severe dysfunction (SDD), using a previously validated 3-staged classification.
RESULTS: There were 16 deaths and 42 combined end points of death and hospitalization. Although each classification method globally prognosticated survival (P = 0.001, P =0.046, and P = 0.034 by the echo class, clinical class and LVEF grades, respectively), only echo class correctly distinguished three risk levels. Death was not hierarchically predicted by LVEF whereas severe diastolic dysfunction was associated with a hazard ratio by univariate or a multivariate model (that evaluated the effects of age, gender, and LVEF) of 4.31 (P =0.004) or 3.88 (P = 0.03), respectively. Also, a significant separation was found for the combined end points associated with SDD relative to nonsevere echo classes (P = 0.045). Neither clinical risk staging, nor LV grading showed significant separation of the Kaplan-Meier plots between "high risk" versus others combined, and Normal LV grade versus others combined, respectively. Severe diastolic dysfunction trended strongly as an independent predictor of combined end point with multivariate hazard of 2.29 (95% CI 0.99-5.26 P=0.05).
CONCLUSION: Stratification of the severity of diastolic dysfunction using comprehensive echocardiographic parameters of systolic and diastolic function is effective at predicting death and hospital-free survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18269562     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00578.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Echocardiography        ISSN: 0742-2822            Impact factor:   1.724


  4 in total

1.  Usefulness of the Echocardiographic Multi-Parameter Score (EMPS) in evaluating left ventricular global heart function.

Authors:  Bingyuan Zhou; Junhua Yang; Xiangjun Yang; Yongming He; Caiming Zhao; Sudan Xu; Huifeng Wang
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2011

2.  Successful treatment of hypertension accounts for improvements in markers of diastolic function - a pilot study comparing hydrochlorothiazide-based and amlodipine-based treatment strategies.

Authors:  Kofo O Ogunyankin; Andrew G Day
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Prevalence, prospective risk markers, and prognosis associated with the presence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in young adults: the coronary artery risk development in young adults study.

Authors:  Chintan S Desai; Laura A Colangelo; Kiang Liu; David R Jacobs; Nakela L Cook; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Kofo O Ogunyankin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Association between troponin T and impaired left ventricular relaxation in patients with acute decompensated heart failure with preserved systolic function.

Authors:  Ravi V Shah; Annabel A Chen-Tournoux; Michael H Picard; James L Januzzi
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-05-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.