Literature DB >> 18268415

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the definition of threshold levels to diagnose coronary artery disease on electrocardiographic stress testing. Part II: the use of ROC curves in the choice of electrocardiographic stress test markers of ischaemia.

Stefania Marazìa1, Luca Barnabei, Raffaele De Caterina.   

Abstract

A common problem in diagnostic medicine, when performing a diagnostic test, is to obtain an accurate discrimination between 'normal' cases and cases with disease, owing to the overlapping distributions of these populations. In clinical practice, it is exceedingly rare that a chosen cut point will achieve perfect discrimination between normal cases and those with disease, and one has to select the best compromise between sensitivity and specificity by comparing the diagnostic performance of different tests or diagnostic criteria available. Receiver operating characteristic (or receiver operator characteristic, ROC) curves allow systematic and intuitively appealing descriptions of the diagnostic performance of a test and a comparison of the performance of different tests or diagnostic criteria. This review will analyse the basic principles underlying ROC curves and their specific application to the choice of optimal parameters on exercise electrocardiographic stress testing. Part II will be devoted to the comparative analysis of various parameters derived from exercise stress testing for the diagnosis of underlying coronary artery disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18268415     DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32813ef418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 1558-2027            Impact factor:   2.160


  2 in total

1.  The terminal part of the QT interval (T peak to T end): a predictor of mortality after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gunnar Erikssen; Knut Liestøl; Lars Gullestad; Kristina H Haugaa; Bjørn Bendz; Jan P Amlie
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study.

Authors:  Yvonne W M Schulte-van Maaren; Ingrid V E Carlier; Frans G Zitman; Albert M van Hemert; Margot W M de Waal; Martijn S van Noorden; Erik J Giltay
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.630

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.