BACKGROUND: We determined the effects of levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer, on left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in patients with LV hypertrophy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective, randomized, blinded study, 23 patients received eitherlevosimendan (0.1 and 0.2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1); n=12) or placebo (n=11) after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. The effects on LV performance, dimensions, filling patterns, and isovolumic relaxation time, as well as systemic hemodynamics, were assessed by pulmonary artery thermodilution catheterization and transesophageal 2-dimensional Doppler echocardiography. To circumvent the confounding effects of the levosimendan-induced hemodynamic changes on Doppler echocardiographic indexes of LV early relaxation, heart rate and mean arterial and central venous pressures were kept constant during levosimendan/placebo infusion by atrial pacing, vasopressor, and colloid infusions. In the levosimendan group, dose-dependent increases in cardiac output (28%; P<0.001) and stroke volume (26%; P<0.001) and a decrease in systemic vascular resistance (-22%; P<0.001) were observed. There was a trend for an increase in LV ejection fraction (12%; P=0.058) with levosimendan. There were no significant differences in systolic, diastolic arterial, or LV filling pressures or LV end-diastolic area between the 2 groups. Isovolumic relaxation time decreased (-23%; P<0.001), as did the deceleration slope of early diastolic filling (-45%; P<0.01), whereas peak early diastolic filling velocity (16%, P<0.01) and peak late diastolic filling velocity (15%; P<0.001) increased after levosimendan compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS:Levosimendan, in addition to its inotropic effects, exerts a direct positive lusitropic effect in patients with LV hypertrophy as it shortens isovolumic relaxation time and improves LV filling.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We determined the effects of levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer, on left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in patients with LV hypertrophy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective, randomized, blinded study, 23 patients received either levosimendan (0.1 and 0.2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1); n=12) or placebo (n=11) after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. The effects on LV performance, dimensions, filling patterns, and isovolumic relaxation time, as well as systemic hemodynamics, were assessed by pulmonary artery thermodilution catheterization and transesophageal 2-dimensional Doppler echocardiography. To circumvent the confounding effects of the levosimendan-induced hemodynamic changes on Doppler echocardiographic indexes of LV early relaxation, heart rate and mean arterial and central venous pressures were kept constant during levosimendan/placebo infusion by atrial pacing, vasopressor, and colloid infusions. In the levosimendan group, dose-dependent increases in cardiac output (28%; P<0.001) and stroke volume (26%; P<0.001) and a decrease in systemic vascular resistance (-22%; P<0.001) were observed. There was a trend for an increase in LV ejection fraction (12%; P=0.058) with levosimendan. There were no significant differences in systolic, diastolic arterial, or LV filling pressures or LV end-diastolic area between the 2 groups. Isovolumic relaxation time decreased (-23%; P<0.001), as did the deceleration slope of early diastolic filling (-45%; P<0.01), whereas peak early diastolic filling velocity (16%, P<0.01) and peak late diastolic filling velocity (15%; P<0.001) increased after levosimendan compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS:Levosimendan, in addition to its inotropic effects, exerts a direct positive lusitropic effect in patients with LV hypertrophy as it shortens isovolumic relaxation time and improves LV filling.
Authors: Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: K Distelmaier; C Roth; L Schrutka; C Binder; B Steinlechner; G Heinz; I M Lang; G Maurer; H Koinig; A Niessner; M Hülsmann; W Speidl; G Goliasch Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Filippo Sanfilippo; Carlos Corredor; Nick Fletcher; Giora Landesberg; Umberto Benedetto; Pierre Foex; Maurizio Cecconi Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Renata G Ferreira; Andrea Worthington; Chuan-Chin Huang; Sary F Aranki; Jochen D Muehlschlegel Journal: J Card Surg Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 1.620
Authors: Alexandre Mebazaa; Antonis A Pitsis; Alain Rudiger; Wolfgang Toller; Dan Longrois; Sven-Erik Ricksten; Ilona Bobek; Stefan De Hert; Georg Wieselthaler; Uwe Schirmer; Ludwig K von Segesser; Michael Sander; Don Poldermans; Marco Ranucci; Peter C J Karpati; Patrick Wouters; Manfred Seeberger; Edith R Schmid; Walter Weder; Ferenc Follath Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 9.097