Literature DB >> 18268146

Trends and cardiovascular mortality effects of state-level blood pressure and uncontrolled hypertension in the United States.

Majid Ezzati1, Shefali Oza, Goodarz Danaei, Christopher J L Murray.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality and has lifestyle and healthcare determinants that vary across states. Only self-reported hypertension status is measured at the state level in the United States. Our aim was to estimate levels and trends in state-level mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), the prevalence of uncontrolled systolic hypertension, and cardiovascular mortality attributable to all levels of higher-than-optimal SBP. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We estimated the relationship between actual SBP/uncontrolled hypertension and self-reported hypertension, use of blood pressure medication, and a set of health system and sociodemographic variables in the nationally representative National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We applied this relationship to identical variables from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to estimate state-specific mean SBP and uncontrolled hypertension. We used the comparative risk assessment methods to estimate cardiovascular mortality attributable to higher-than-optimal SBP. In 2001-2003, age-standardized uncontrolled hypertension prevalence was highest in the District of Columbia, Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, Texas, Georgia, and South Carolina (18% to 21% for men and 24% to 26% for women) and lowest in Vermont, Minnesota, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Iowa, and Colorado (15% to 16% for men and approximately 21% for women). Women had a higher prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension than men in every state by 4 (Arizona) to 7 (Kansas) percentage points. In the 1990s, uncontrolled hypertension in women increased the most in Idaho and Oregon (by 6 percentage points) and the least in the District of Columbia and Mississippi (by 3 percentage points). For men, the worst-performing states were New Mexico and Louisiana (decrease of 0.6 and 1.3 percentage points), and the best-performing states were Vermont and Indiana (decrease of 4 and 3 percentage points). Age-standardized cardiovascular mortality attributable to higher-than-optimal SBP ranged from 200 to 220 per 100,000 (Minnesota and Massachusetts) to 360 to 370 per 100,000 (District of Columbia and Mississippi) for women and from 210 per 100,000 (Colorado and Utah) to 370 per 100,000 (Mississippi) and 410 per 100,000 (District of Columbia) for men.
CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle and pharmacological interventions for lowering blood pressure are particularly needed in the South and Appalachia, and with emphasis on control among women. Self-reported data on hypertension diagnosis from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System can be used to obtain unbiased state-level estimates of blood pressure and uncontrolled hypertension as benchmarks for priority setting and for designing and evaluating intervention programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18268146     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.732131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  55 in total

1.  Trends in cardiovascular risk factor levels in the Minnesota Heart Survey (1980-2002) as compared with the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1976-2002): A partial explanation for Minnesota's low cardiovascular disease mortality?

Authors:  Huifen Wang; Lyn M Steffen; David R Jacobs; Xia Zhou; Henry Blackburn; Alan K Berger; Kristian B Filion; Russell V Luepker
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Gender differences in hypertension and hypertension awareness among young adults.

Authors:  Bethany Everett; Anna Zajacova
Journal:  Biodemography Soc Biol       Date:  2015

Review 3.  Role of dietary therapies in the prevention and treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  Viresh Mohanlal; Afshin Parsa; Matthew R Weir
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 4.  Perioperative hypertensive emergencies.

Authors:  Solomon Aronson
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Validating prediction equations for mid-arm circumference measurements in adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2012.

Authors:  Tatiana Nwankwo; Yechiam Ostchega; Guangyu Zhang; Jeffery P Hughes
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.444

6.  Put pressure worldwide on blood pressure control.

Authors:  Simona Costanzo; Giovanni de Gaetano; Licia Iacoviello
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Association of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion With Access to and Quality of Care for Surgical Conditions.

Authors:  Andrew P. Loehrer; David C. Chang; John W. Scott; Matthew M. Hutter; Virendra I. Patel; Jeffrey E. Lee; Benjamin D. Sommers
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  The promise of prevention: the effects of four preventable risk factors on national life expectancy and life expectancy disparities by race and county in the United States.

Authors:  Goodarz Danaei; Eric B Rimm; Shefali Oza; Sandeep C Kulkarni; Christopher J L Murray; Majid Ezzati
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Trends in risk factors for cardiovascular disease in Canada: temporal, socio-demographic and geographic factors.

Authors:  Douglas S Lee; Maria Chiu; Douglas G Manuel; Karen Tu; Xuesong Wang; Peter C Austin; Michelle Y Mattern; Tezeta F Mitiku; Lawrence W Svenson; Wayne Putnam; William M Flanagan; Jack V Tu
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Coronary heart disease mortality among young adults in Scotland in relation to social inequalities: time trend study.

Authors:  Martin O'Flaherty; Jennifer Bishop; Adam Redpath; Terry McLaughlin; David Murphy; James Chalmers; Simon Capewell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.