Literature DB >> 18268030

Iron-regulated biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus Newman requires ica and the secreted protein Emp.

Miranda Johnson1, Alan Cockayne, Julie A Morrissey.   

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation is induced in iron-restricted growth conditions in vitro. In this study, we showed that Emp and Eap play important roles in low-iron-induced biofilm formation of S. aureus Newman. Eap and Emp are secreted proteins which are non-covalently attached to the S. aureus cell surface and have previously been implicated in a number of aspects of S. aureus pathogenesis. We showed here that the transcription of these important virulence factors is induced by growth in low-iron medium, reflective of the in vivo environment. Our results show that iron regulation of Eap and Emp is Fur independent. However, Fur is required for full induction of eap and emp expression in low-iron conditions. In this study, we demonstrated that in addition to Fur, low-iron-induced biofilm formation requires Sae, Agr, and SarA. In iron-restricted growth conditions, Sae and Agr are essential for Emp and Eap expression and hence for biofilm formation, whereas SarA appears to have a less-significant role. We also showed that expression of the ica operon is required for biofilm formation in iron-restricted growth conditions. We demonstrated that in fact, ica is required for the expression of the important multifunctional virulence determinants eap and emp.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18268030      PMCID: PMC2292859          DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01635-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  49 in total

1.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Adherence of Staphylococcus aureus is enhanced by an endogenous secreted protein with broad binding activity.

Authors:  M Palma; A Haggar; J I Flock
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin or protein factors in biofilm accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from prosthetic hip and knee joint infections.

Authors:  Holger Rohde; Eike C Burandt; Nicolaus Siemssen; Lars Frommelt; Christoph Burdelski; Sabine Wurster; Stefanie Scherpe; Angharad P Davies; Llinos G Harris; Matthias A Horstkotte; Johannes K-M Knobloch; Chandran Ragunath; Jeffrey B Kaplan; Dietrich Mack
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Biofilm formation, icaADBC transcription, and polysaccharide intercellular adhesin synthesis by staphylococci in a device-related infection model.

Authors:  Ursula Fluckiger; Martina Ulrich; Andrea Steinhuber; Gerd Döring; Dietrich Mack; Regine Landmann; Christiane Goerke; Christiane Wolz
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Association between methicillin susceptibility and biofilm regulation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from device-related infections.

Authors:  Eoghan O'Neill; Clarissa Pozzi; Patrick Houston; Davida Smyth; Hilary Humphreys; D Ashley Robinson; James P O'Gara
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  The intercellular adhesin locus ica is present in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from bacteremic patients with infected and uninfected prosthetic joints.

Authors:  V G Fowler; P D Fey; L B Reller; A L Chamis; G R Corey; M E Rupp
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Staphylococcus aureus develops an alternative, ica-independent biofilm in the absence of the arlRS two-component system.

Authors:  Alejandro Toledo-Arana; Nekane Merino; Marta Vergara-Irigaray; Michel Débarbouillé; José R Penadés; Iñigo Lasa
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  The teicoplanin-associated locus regulator (TcaR) and the intercellular adhesin locus regulator (IcaR) are transcriptional inhibitors of the ica locus in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Kimberly K Jefferson; Danielle B Pier; Donald A Goldmann; Gerald B Pier
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 9.  ica and beyond: biofilm mechanisms and regulation in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  James P O'Gara
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 2.742

10.  Staphylococcus aureus redirects central metabolism to increase iron availability.

Authors:  David B Friedman; Devin L Stauff; Gleb Pishchany; Corbin W Whitwell; Victor J Torres; Eric P Skaar
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.823

View more
  46 in total

Review 1.  Molecular mechanisms of Staphylococcus aureus iron acquisition.

Authors:  Neal D Hammer; Eric P Skaar
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 15.500

2.  Comparison of the regulation, metabolic functions, and roles in virulence of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase homologues gapA and gapB in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Joanne Purves; Alan Cockayne; Peter C E Moody; Julie A Morrissey
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  LuxS mediates iron-dependent biofilm formation, competence, and fratricide in Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Claudia Trappetti; Adam J Potter; Adrienne W Paton; Marco R Oggioni; James C Paton
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Growth in glucose-based medium and exposure to subinhibitory concentrations of imipenem induce biofilm formation in a multidrug-resistant clinical isolate of Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Elisabetta Nucleo; Laura Steffanoni; Giulia Fugazza; Roberta Migliavacca; Ernesto Giacobone; Antonella Navarra; Laura Pagani; Paolo Landini
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 5.  Connecting iron acquisition and biofilm formation in the ESKAPE pathogens as a strategy for combatting antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Savannah J Post; Justin A Shapiro; William M Wuest
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.597

6.  Rsp inhibits attachment and biofilm formation by repressing fnbA in Staphylococcus aureus MW2.

Authors:  Mei G Lei; David Cue; Christelle M Roux; Paul M Dunman; Chia Y Lee
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Redundant and Distinct Roles of Secreted Protein Eap and Cell Wall-Anchored Protein SasG in Biofilm Formation and Pathogenicity of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Keigo Yonemoto; Akio Chiba; Shinya Sugimoto; Chikara Sato; Mitsuru Saito; Yuki Kinjo; Keishi Marumo; Yoshimitsu Mizunoe
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Copper stress induces a global stress response in Staphylococcus aureus and represses sae and agr expression and biofilm formation.

Authors:  Jonathan Baker; Sutthirat Sitthisak; Mrittika Sengupta; Miranda Johnson; R K Jayaswal; Julie A Morrissey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Staphylococcus epidermidis Esp degrades specific proteins associated with Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and host-pathogen interaction.

Authors:  Shinya Sugimoto; Takeo Iwamoto; Koji Takada; Ken-Ichi Okuda; Akiko Tajima; Tadayuki Iwase; Yoshimitsu Mizunoe
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  The use of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for prosthetic biofilm prevention.

Authors:  Erik N Taylor; Thomas J Webster
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2009-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.