Literature DB >> 18267342

Baseline echographic characteristics of tumors in eyes of patients enrolled in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study: COMS report no. 29.

H Culver Boldt, Sandra Frazier Byrne, Marta Marsh Gilson, Paul T Finger, Ronald L Green, Bradley R Straatsma, E Rand Simpson, Barbara S Hawkins.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report baseline echographic characteristics of tumors in patients enrolled in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) randomized trials, to determine how often these characteristics matched prespecified criteria for choroidal melanoma, to explore associations between echographic variables, and to compare specific echographic characteristics with pathologic characteristics of tumors in enucleated eyes.
DESIGN: Retrospective analyses of baseline data from multicenter randomized clinical trials. PARTICIPANTS: Patients enrolled in the COMS large trial or medium tumor trials (N = 2320).
METHODS: Standardized echography was used to document selected characteristics of tumors at baseline. Criteria were established to assess the consistency of echographic features with the diagnosis of melanoma. For eyes assigned to enucleation, the echographic diagnosis and evaluation for extraocular extension by the Echography Center were compared with gradings made by the Pathology Center and Pathology Review Committee. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of various echographic and pathologic characteristics.
RESULTS: Two thousand forty-three tumors (88%) exhibited low to medium reflectivity (n = 1409), a mushroom shape (n = 101), or both (n = 533). Tumors with apical height > 10 mm were more likely (P<0.001) to have a mushroom shape and less likely to have a posterior location (P<0.001) than less elevated tumors. One thousand five hundred fifty-nine (99.7%) of 1563 tumors judged by echography to be consistent with the diagnosis of melanoma were confirmed by pathology to be choroidal melanoma. For measurable extrascleral tumors < 1.5 mm in height by pathology, the Echography Center graders judged extrascleral extension as possibly present in only 1 of 16 (6%) tumors, compared with 57% (4/7) of eyes with extrascleral extension measuring > or = 1.5 mm in height.
CONCLUSIONS: Eighty-eight percent of the tumors in the COMS exhibited features characteristic for melanoma: low to medium reflectivity, the classic mushroom shape, or both. Using additional preset criteria, 96% of tumors exhibited baseline echographic characteristics consistent with the diagnosis of melanoma. Echography graders were able to detect extrascleral nodules > or = 1.5 mm in elevation but not minimally elevated extraocular tumor extension. Clinicians and echographers can use these data to improve their understanding of the echographic features of untreated uveal melanomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18267342     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  11 in total

1.  Efficacy of High Frequency Ultrasound in Localization and Characterization of Orbital Lesions.

Authors:  Rashmi M Nagaraju; G Gurushankar; Bindushree Kadakola
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-09-01

2.  A prospective analysis of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in patients with uveal melanoma: comparison between metabolic rate of glucose (MRglu) and standardized uptake value (SUV) and correlations with histopathological features.

Authors:  Maria Lucia Calcagni; Maria Vittoria Mattoli; Maria Antonietta Blasi; Gianluigi Petrone; Maria Grazia Sammarco; Luca Indovina; Antonino Mulè; Vittoria Rufini; Alessandro Giordano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  In vivo high-frequency, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of uveal melanoma in mice: imaging features and histopathologic correlations.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Hua Yang; Shin J Kang; Yanggan Wang; Geoffrey D Wang; Tonya Coulthard; Hans E Grossniklaus
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Optic Disc Pyogenic Granuloma.

Authors:  Eduardo F Marback; Luciano Espinheira Fonseca; Roberto L Marback
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2016-11-09

5.  In vivo high-frequency contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of choroidal melanoma in rabbits: imaging features and histopathologic correlations.

Authors:  Shin J Kang; Qing Zhang; Samirkumar R Patel; Damian Berezovsky; Hua Yang; Yanggan Wang; Hans E Grossniklaus
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-04       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 6.  Using risk factors for detection and prognostication of uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Pukhraj Rishi; Vikram V Koundanya; Carol L Shields
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 7.  Uveal Melanoma: Current Trends in Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Berçin Tarlan; Hayyam Kıratlı
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-06

8.  Posterior Scleritis Simulating Choroidal Melanoma: A Case Report.

Authors:  Simanta Khadka; Raghunandan Byanju; Sangita Pradhan
Journal:  Beyoglu Eye J       Date:  2021-06-08

9.  Successful response to first-line treatment with osimertinib for choroidal metastasis from EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Matthew G Field; H Culver Boldt; Taher Abu Hejleh; Elaine M Binkley
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-01

10.  Understanding the structural changes following photodynamic and transpupillary thermotherapy for choroidal hemangioma using optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography.

Authors:  Vishal Raval; Mudit Tyagi; Jay Chhablani; Swathi Kaliki; Rajeev Reddy; Taraprasad Das
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.