Literature DB >> 1826724

Combined gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist/human menopausal gonadotropin therapy (GnRH-a/hMG) in normal, high, and poor responders to hMG.

Z Ben-Rafael1, D Bider, U Dan, M Zolti, D Levran, S Mashiach.   

Abstract

Patients who failed to conceive after gonadotropin stimulation in in vitro fertilization treatment were classified into normal, high, or poor responders. They were routinely offered another cycle with a combination of a gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and gonadotropin therapy (in order to evaluate whether this combined therapy could improve their response). The gonadotropin-induced cycle was compared with the combined therapy cycle. With the combination treatment, in the normal responders the phase of ovarian stimulation was significantly (P less than 0.001) prolonged, and the number of follicles and oocytes collected (5.7 +/- 0.7 vs 3.1 +/- 0.4) was increased, without any change in serum estradiol level compared to the control cycle. In high responders the number of oocytes was not modified by the combined treatment compared with the control cycle. However, serum estradiol level was significantly (P less than 0.005) decreased. The combined therapy did not modify any parameter of response in poor responders. We conclude that the response to combined agonist/gonadotropin therapy is dependent on the patient's own basal response. No improvement in response was expected in poor responders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1826724     DOI: 10.1007/bf01131588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf        ISSN: 0740-7769


  12 in total

1.  Utilization of GnRH agonists for poor responders in an IVF programme.

Authors:  J Belaisch-Allart; J Testart; R Frydman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Induction of multiple follicular growth in normally menstruating women with endogenous gonadotropin suppression.

Authors:  R Fleming; J R Coutts
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Stimulation protocols for patients with "atypical response".

Authors:  S J Muasher
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Protocols for induction of ovulation. The concept of programmed cycles.

Authors:  S Mashiach; J Dor; M Goldenberg; J Shalev; J Blankstein; E Rudak; Z Shoam; Z Finelt; L Nebel; B Goldman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  An alternate approach to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in "poor responders": pretreatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog.

Authors:  P Serafini; B Stone; J Kerin; J Batzofin; P Quinn; R P Marrs
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Medical hypophysectomy: II. Variability of ovarian response to gonadotropin therapy.

Authors:  D Kenigsberg; B A Littman; R F Williams; G D Hodgen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Three years of in vitro fertilization at Norfolk.

Authors:  H W Jones; A A Acosta; M C Andrews; J E Garcia; G S Jones; J Mayer; J S McDowell; Z Rosenwaks; B A Sandow; L L Veeck
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Successful treatment of infertile women with oligomenorrhoea using a combination of an LHRH agonist and exogenous gonadotrophins.

Authors:  R Fleming; M J Haxton; M P Hamilton; G S McCune; W P Black; M C MacNaughton; J R Coutts
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1985-04

9.  Human menopausal gonadotropin/human chorionic gonadotropin follicular maturation for oocyte aspiration: phase II, 1981.

Authors:  J E Garcia; G S Jones; A A Acosta; G Wright
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Short term use of an LHRH agonist to treat poor responders entering an in-vitro fertilization programme.

Authors:  C M Howles; M C Macnamee; R G Edwards
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  6 in total

1.  Estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase in poor responder patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Marzieh Aghahosseini; Ashraf Aleyassin; Sepideh Khodaverdi; Fatemeh Esfahani; Robabeh Mohammadbeigi; Shohreh Movahedi; Ali Kord Valeshabad; Atossa Mahdavi; Parvin Fallahi; Parisa Shabani; Zahra Rezaeeian; Maryam Khodaverdi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  What is the best protocol for ovarian superovulation?

Authors:  B Hedon; B Camier; F Arnal; C Humeau
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The prognostic importance of the number of oocytes retrieved and estradiol levels in poor and normal responders in in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.

Authors:  J Dor; D S Seidman; I Ben-Shlomo; D Levran; A Karasik; S Mashiach
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Oral contraceptive pretreatment does not improve outcome in microdose gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocol among poor responder intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients.

Authors:  Candan Iltemir Duvan; Bulent Berker; Nilgun Ozturk Turhan; Hakan Satiroglu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Decreased fertility in poor responder women is not related to oocyte morphological status.

Authors:  Marcílio Nichi; Rita de Cassia Sávio Figueira; Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga; Amanda Souza Setti; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 6.  Management of poor responders in IVF: is there anything new?

Authors:  Filippo Ubaldi; Alberto Vaiarelli; Rosario D'Anna; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.