Literature DB >> 18267169

Prosthetic material in inguinal hernia repair: how do I choose?

David B Earle1, Lisa A Mark.   

Abstract

With numerous prosthetic options and a changing landscape of prosthetic development, a systematic approach to choosing a prosthetic is more sensible than trying to memorize all the details of each prosthetic. The surgeon should hone a single technique for the vast majority of inguinal hernia repairs to maximize proficiency. This limits the number of prosthetics to those suitable for that technique. Narrowing the choice further should be based on the likelihood that a given prosthetic will achieve the preoperative goals of the hernia repair. For alternative clinical scenarios, the surgeon should know one to two additional techniques, which may require a different prosthetic. The surgeon should use existing experimental and clinical data to estimate long-term benefits of any new prosthetic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18267169     DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Clin North Am        ISSN: 0039-6109            Impact factor:   2.741


  31 in total

1.  Physicomechanical evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier composite meshes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Corey R Deeken; Michael S Abdo; Margaret M Frisella; Brent D Matthews
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Searching for the best polypropylene mesh to be used in bowel contamination.

Authors:  A Díaz-Godoy; M A García-Ureña; J López-Monclús; V Vega Ruíz; D Melero Montes; N Erquinigo Agurto
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic hernia repair comparing titanium-coated lightweight mesh and medium-weight composite mesh.

Authors:  Alfredo Moreno-Egea; Andrés Carrillo-Alcaraz; Víctor Soria-Aledo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Current trends in laparoscopic groin hernia repair: A review.

Authors:  Harvinder Singh Pahwa; Awanish Kumar; Prerit Agarwal; Akshay Anand Agarwal
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 5.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Jihad El Anzaoui; Omar Ghoundale; Driss Touiti; Pierre Henri Savoie; Julien Laroche; Philipe Riviere; Loic Lemesle; Robert Fournier
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Effect of enzymatic degradation on the mechanical properties of biological scaffold materials.

Authors:  Afua H Annor; Michael E Tang; Chi Lun Pui; Gregory C Ebersole; Margaret M Frisella; Brent D Matthews; Corey R Deeken
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Classification of prosthetics used in hernia repair based on weight and biomaterial.

Authors:  A Coda; R Lamberti; S Martorana
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 8.  A review of the composition, characteristics, and effectiveness of barrier mesh prostheses utilized for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Corey R Deeken; Keith M Faucher; Brent D Matthews
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Transvaginal repair of stage III-IV cystocele using a lightweight mesh: safety and 36-month outcome.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Majid Brouziyne; Gérard Priou; Guy Devoldère; Gérard Marie; Joël Renaudie
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  SAGES guidelines for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  David Earle; J Scott Roth; Alan Saber; Steve Haggerty; Joel F Bradley; Robert Fanelli; Raymond Price; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.