OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence for effectiveness of HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention interventions in female sex workers in resource poor settings. METHOD: Published and unpublished studies were identified through electronic databases (Cochrane database, Medline, Embase, and Web of Science), hand searching and contacting experts. Randomized-controlled-trials and quasi-experimental studies were included if they were conducted in female sex workers from low and middle income settings; if the exposure was described; if the outcome was externally measurable, it was after the discovery of HIV, and if follow-up was longer than 6 months. A priori criteria were used to extract data. Meta-analysis was not performed due to the heterogeneity of studies. RESULTS: Twenty-eight interventions were included. Despite methodological limitations, the evidence suggested that combining sexual risk reduction, condom promotion and improved access to STI treatment reduces HIV and STI acquisition in sex workers receiving the intervention. Strong evidence that regular STI screening or periodic treatment of STIs confers additional protection against HIV was lacking. It appears that structural interventions, policy change or empowerment of sex workers, reduce the prevalence of STIs and HIV. CONCLUSION: Rigorous evaluation of HIV/STI prevention interventions in sex workers is challenging. There is some evidence for the efficacy of multi-component interventions, and/or structural interventions. The effect of these interventions on the wider population has rarely been evaluated.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence for effectiveness of HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention interventions in female sex workers in resource poor settings. METHOD: Published and unpublished studies were identified through electronic databases (Cochrane database, Medline, Embase, and Web of Science), hand searching and contacting experts. Randomized-controlled-trials and quasi-experimental studies were included if they were conducted in female sex workers from low and middle income settings; if the exposure was described; if the outcome was externally measurable, it was after the discovery of HIV, and if follow-up was longer than 6 months. A priori criteria were used to extract data. Meta-analysis was not performed due to the heterogeneity of studies. RESULTS: Twenty-eight interventions were included. Despite methodological limitations, the evidence suggested that combining sexual risk reduction, condom promotion and improved access to STI treatment reduces HIV and STI acquisition in sex workers receiving the intervention. Strong evidence that regular STI screening or periodic treatment of STIs confers additional protection against HIV was lacking. It appears that structural interventions, policy change or empowerment of sex workers, reduce the prevalence of STIs and HIV. CONCLUSION: Rigorous evaluation of HIV/STI prevention interventions in sex workers is challenging. There is some evidence for the efficacy of multi-component interventions, and/or structural interventions. The effect of these interventions on the wider population has rarely been evaluated.
Authors: M Sabidó; G Hernández; V González; X Vallès; A Montoliu; J Figuerola; V Isern; B Viñado; L Figueroa; J Casabona Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2008-12-03 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Alanna Fitzgerald-Husek; Alexandra L C Martiniuk; Reece Hinchcliff; Christine E Aochamus; Richard B Lee Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 2.809
Authors: Kathleen N Deering; Melanie Rusch; Ofer Amram; Jill Chettiar; Paul Nguyen; Cindy X Feng; Kate Shannon Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2013-12-22
Authors: Fredrick Odhiambo Otieno; Richard Ndivo; Simon Oswago; Sherri Pals; Robert Chen; Timothy Thomas; Ernesta Kunneke; Lisa A Mills; Eleanor McLellan-Lemal Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Larry W Chang; David Serwadda; Thomas C Quinn; Maria J Wawer; Ronald H Gray; Steven J Reynolds Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Scott D Rhodes; Amanda Tanner; Stacy Duck; Robert E Aronson; Jorge Alonzo; Manuel Garcia; Aimee M Wilkin; Rebecca Cashman; Aaron T Vissman; Cindy Miller; Karen Kroeger; Michelle J Naughton Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2012
Authors: Tommi L Gaines; Melanie L A Rusch; Kimberly C Brouwer; Shira M Goldenberg; Remedios Lozada; Angela M Robertson; Emily Perkins; Steffanie A Strathdee; Thomas L Patterson Journal: Glob Public Health Date: 2013-03-27
Authors: Kathleen N Deering; Tara Lyons; Cindy X Feng; Bohdan Nosyk; Steffanie A Strathdee; Julio S G Montaner; Kate Shannon Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 3.731